Advanced Search Results

Mrs. M. Raghava Rani Vs. the Govt. of A.P., Rep. by Its Ex-officio Sec ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 10(1A); ;Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993; ;Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 31(8); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : AIR2004AP478; 2004(4)ALD454; 2004(5)ALT188

District Forum, Ongole, Prakasam District after being selected by the Selection Committee constituted under Section 10(1-A) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, 'the Act'). She assumed the Office on 06-05-1998 and completed her tenure on 05-05-2003. Before the … the powers of the Executive Committee and the Chancellor to disagree with the recommendations of the Selection Committee. Section 31 of the U.P. State Universities Act was analogous to Section 10 of the Consumer Protection Act inasmuch as

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Samir ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 31; Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Reported in : 2005(4)ALT59(SC); 2005(3)AWC2501(SC); 2005(3)BLJR1752; 2006(1)BomCR870; III(2005)CPJ2(SC); [2006(2)JCR175(SC)]; JT2005(6)SC289; (2006)148PLR143; (2005)5SCC784; 2005(2)LC105

order of the Stats Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short the 'State Commission'). The revision filed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the 'Act') was dismissed. The respondent (hereinafter referred to as the 'complainant') had lodged a complaint … by this Court in Avadh Kishore Das v. Ram Gopal and Ors. : AIR1979SC861 in the backdrop of Section 31 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act') it is true that evidentiary admissions are not

Shivraj M. Girglani and Others Vs. Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-oper ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Accountant General, M.P. Vs. S.K.Dubey and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9(1), 30(2), 16(2), 31; First Schedule of the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 - Articles 112(3)(d)(iii), 217(1), 221 and 224A; Madhya Pradesh Consumer Protection Rules, 1987; Constitution Of India - Article 136; Madras Race Club (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1986

Disputes Redressal Commission, Madhya Pradesh (for short, 'State Commission') established under clause (b) of Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ( for short, '1986 Act'). The respondent assumed office on September 21, 1998 and continued to hold that … section 15 and clause (b) of sub- section (1) and sub-section (2) of section 16 of this Act.".28. Section 31 makes a provision that rules and regulations made under the 1986 Act shall be laid before each House

State of Haryana and anr. Vs. National Consumer Awareness Group and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConsumerConstitution

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 16, 16(1), 16(1A) and 16(1B); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 217, 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2005SC2356; 2005(2)AWC1691(SC); III(2006)CPJ8(SC); [2005(3)JCR127(SC)]; JT2005(5)SC151; (2005)5SCC284; 2005(3)SLJ156(SC)

of the statutory consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court postulated under Section 16(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is the core issue subjected to debate before us in these two appeals.3. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 … In response to a representation dated 22.12.2003 received from the National Consumer Awareness Group, Respondent No. 1, on 31.12.2003 the Government of India, Department of Consumer Affairs, issued a clarification to all the State Governments/ U.T. Administration

Canara Bank Vs. M/S. JaIn Motor Trading Company and Another

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Kishore Shriram SaThe Vs. Vivek Gajanan Joshi

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Super Cassetts Industries Ltd. Vs. Music Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 31(1)(b), 19-A, 52(1)(j)(4); Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 1985 - Section 41(1); Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 151; Trade Marks Act - Section 25(i); Indian Copyright Act, 1914 - Section 72; Copyright Act, 1911 - Section 4; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Section 22(1), 19(1)(6); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973, - Sections 345, 346 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193, 228, 125

recalled upon to consider as to whether the District Forum and the State Commission as established under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, had the power to recall an ex parte order. After examining various provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, … sole question for consideration in these appeals is whether on a complaint made to the Copyright Board under Section 31 of the Copyright Act, 1957, the said Board under Clause (b) of Sub-Section (1) can pass an interim

Shahaji Alloys Steel Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Sicom Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 31 and 31(1); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 1

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR11; 2008(6)BomCR280

that principle.In another case, the Hon'ble Apex Court had an occasion to consider similar provisions contained under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. In (Topline Shoes Ltd. v. Corporation Bank) : [2002]3SCR1167 , the Hon'ble Apex Court considered the question-whether or … a deemed Financial Corporation.As there was default in repayment of the loan, respondent No. 1 initiated proceedings under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, for enforcing the liability against the original debtor and guarantors (petitioner

Director of Insurance, A.P. Government Vs. G. Vijaya Lakshmi

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad