Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: consumer protection act 1986 section 3 · Page 1 of about 6,765 results (0.125 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 19 2004

Branch Manager, Margadarsi Chit Fund Limited and anr. Vs. District Con ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-19-2004

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1) and 3(1)

Reported in : AIR2004AP343; 2004(2)ALD645; 2004(2)ALT822; [2005]123CompCas194(AP)

and the members of the chit fund company are consumers within the meaning of Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 2(1)(d) lays down:'Consumer means any person who (i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid … this amount was not given to her.3. In the second complaint which has given rise to CRP No. 3365 of 2002 the complaint and claimed that he was a petrol bunk owner. He was induced by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2004

Sumatidevi M. Dhanwatay Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-06-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 100, 103 and 124A; Constitution of India - Article 21; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR2004SC2368; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)544; 2004(2)AWC2136(SC); 2004(52)BLJR1179; (SCSuppl)2004(4)CHN86; II(2004)CPJ27(SC); JT2004(4)SC537; 2004(4)SCALE607; (2004)6SCC113

maintainability of the complaint or jurisdiction of the State Commission to deal with the complaint. Even otherwise, under Section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the complaint could be entertained by the State Commission in the absence … administration was helpless. In such a situation, no complaint could be entertained by the State Commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.4. We have considered the respective submissions made on behalf of the parties. As is evident from the order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1996

Srimathi and Others Vs. the Union of India, and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-1996

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 17(1); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 6; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13 and 15; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1996Mad427; 1996(2)CTC402; (1996)IIMLJ482

In these writ petitions, a common question is raised regarding the constitutional validity of Section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The prayer in all the writ petitions is for a declaration that Section 3 of the said Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 05 1997

General Manager, Telecom District, Trivandrum and ors. Vs. Consumer Di ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-05-1997

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 7B

Reported in : AIR1998Ker110; [1998]94CompCas717(Ker)

respondent raised a consumer dispute with the 1st respondent. Consumer dispute is defined in Section 2(e) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. It reads as follows :' 'Consumer dispute' means where a person against … Therefore, a dispute raised by the subscriber against the petitioners is certainly maintainable before the Consumer Redressal Forum.4. Section 3 of the said Apt reads as follows:'The provisions of this Act shall be in addition to and not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2000

Smt. Shashi Sharma Vs. State of U. P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-24-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 10 and 10 (2); Uttar Pradesh Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Rules 3 and 3(2) and (5); Constitution of India - Article 16

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2202; (2000)3UPLBEC2630

social justice.4. Heard the counsel for the parties.5. It would be useful to refer to the provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. In so far aa it provides the procedure of composition of District Forum, condition and qualification of its … composition of District Forum, condition and qualification of its members and mode of appointment of Chairman and Members. Section 0 of the Consumer Protection Act. 1986, refers to the composition of the District Forum. It provides as … Other relevant provision available in U. P. Consumer Protection Rules, 1987. Rule 3 so far as it is relevant to the present controversy is reproduced

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 1999

Malappuram District Private Bus Operators' Association, Manjeri and An ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-02-1999

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 90 and 94; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 3

Reported in : AIR2000Ker192

party can file a revision under Section 90 of the Motor Vehicles Act. (2) Section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 provides that the said Act is not in derogation of the provisions of any other law and that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1996

M/S. Fair Air Engineers Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. N.K. Modi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-1996

Subject : Consumer Arbitration

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 10, 16, 20; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27 and 34; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 195 and 228; Constitution of India - Article 32 or 226; Arbitration and Conciliation Third Ordinance, 1996 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR1997SC533; 1997(1)ARBLR23(SC); 1997(2)BLJR1316; [1997]88CompCas663(SC); 1996(2)CTC664; JT1996(8)SC253; 1996(6)SCALE488; (1996)6SCC385; [1996]Supp4SCR820; MANU/SC/0141/1997

appeal. By the impugned order the Commission has held that the proceedings before the forums created under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Act 68 of 1986) (for short the 'Act') is not a legal proceedings nor is the Commission a … provisions of the Act so that we can have a clear picture of the conspectus of its operation. Section 3 envisages that 'the provisions of the Act shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2003

The Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society V ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-2003

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 - Sections 34, 34(3), 75(3), 90 and 156; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1) and 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9; Indian Contract Act, 1972; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1960; Standard of Weights and Measures Act, 1976; Motor Vehicles Act, 1938 - Sectio 165; MRTP Act 1969; Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1954; Arbitration Act; Contract Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR2004SC448; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)108; [2004]118CompCas253(SC); (2004)1CompLJ339(SC); 2004(2)MhLj581; (2004)2MLJ94(SC); 2004MPLJ242(SC); 2003(10)SCALE635; (2004)1SCC305; 2004(1

tribunals including that of a civil court under Section 9 CPC and the Consumer Forum created under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the 1986 Act') from adjudicating upon the issues falling within the scope of said Section; on … the absence of any representation despite service of notice on the respondents, supported the impugned order, contending that Section 3 of the 1986 Act clearly shows that the remedy available under the 1986 Act is in addition to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2000

Prudential Capital Markets Ltd., Calcutta Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-02-2000

Subject : ConsumerConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 3, 12 and 27(1); Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10-E and 58-A; Reserve Bank of India Act - Sections 45-Q and 45-QA; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; CLB Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections - 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections - 193, 195, 196 and 228; Banking Laws (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1963; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections - 34; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections - 9;

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD418; 2000(5)ALT468; [2002]108CompCas441(AP)

State Commission which dismissed the appeal filed and whereupon depositor approached District Forum under Section 27(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereafter called 'the Consumer Act') by filing penalty petition. The second category of cases are those where the … in the RBI Act, the District Forums and Slate Commissions have been entertaining and adjudicating the complaints. As Section 3 of the Consumer Act is not in derogation of the existing laws and as Section 45-Q of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2000

General Manager, Telecom District, Trivandrum and ors. Vs. Consumer Di ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-03-2000

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 3(1), 3(4), 7 and 7B; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1); Telegraph Rules, 1951 - Rules 413 and 443

Reported in : AIR2000Ker250

not maintainable and hence the Forum should have dismissed the same as provided under Section 26 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, hereinafter referred to as 'the Consumer Protection Act'. In the writ petition filed before this Court several contentions … Mr. C. N. Radhakrishnan has raised the following contentions :--(a) The learned single Judge has erred in interpreting Section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act without considering Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 7-B

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial