Advanced Search Results

Trans Mediterranean Airways. Vs. M/S Universal Exports, and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 23, 12, 29, 3, 4, 6A, 7; Air Act, 1972; Indian Carriage By Air Act, 1934 - Section 4; Arbitration Act ; the Contract Act, 1872 - Rule 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 9, Order 21 Rule 37

1) This appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [hereinafter referred to as the C P Act ] against the order in Original Petition No. 161 of … one crore rupees after the 2002 amendment) or more, the National Commission would have jurisdiction by virtue of Section 29 of the CP Act. He also cited some judgments in support of his submissions and differentiated those cited

Fairgrowth Investments Ltd. Vs. the Custodian

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : The Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3(2), 3(3), 4(2), 5, 9(A), 9A(1), 9(4), 10, 10(3), 11 and 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; ;Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A; Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 - Sections 19(2), 116A and 116A(3); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(1); West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417(4); Madhya Pradesh Ceiling of Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 29, 29(2) and 29(3); Limitation Act, 1951 - Sections 116A(3)

Reported in : 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)708; [2004]122CompCas683(SC); (2004)4CompLJ233(SC); JT2004(9)SC124; 2004(8)SCALE817; (2004)11SCC472; [2004]56SCL507(SC); 2005(1)LC251(SC); MANU/SC/0898/2004

Corporation Bank : [2002]3SCR1167 . The subject matter of interpretation in that case was Section 13(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which provides that a person opposing the complaint under the Act was required to file an answer to … an authority for this proposition. The next submission of the appellants' counsel was based on the applicability of Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 whereby, according to him, the provisions of inter alia Section 5 of the

C. Venkatachalam Vs. Ajitkumar C. Shah and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 32, 33; Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Sections 29, 31, 32 - Rule 2(b); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 302, 303, 304; Merchandise Marks Act, 1887; Immigration and Asylum Act - Section 84; Constitution of India - Article 19

petitions were allowed by the Division Bench. The High Court held that the Consumer Fora constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 have “trappings of a civil court” but “are not civil courts within the meaning of the provisions of … to practise has been given only to advocates who are enrolled with the Bar Council of a State. Section 29 of the Advocates Act, 1961 recognised advocates as class of persons entitled to practise the profession of law.

Sehdev Singh Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

S.V.Arumugam Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (CrPC) - Sections 482, 378, 200; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409, 420, 467, 471, 120B; Indian Companies Act 1956; Negotiable Instruments Act (NI ACT) - Section 138; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 17

due. 8. Thereafter in the year 2001 the respondent No.2 filed a complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against Annamalai Company before State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the.State Commission) inter-alia alleging that … stating therein that the Company should sell the shares pledged by him in the near future. Thereafter on 29.05.1999, 04.06.1999 and 02.07.1999 Annamalai Company sold the shares pledged by the respondent No.2 and adjusted the amount in

Accountant General, M.P. Vs. S.K.Dubey and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9(1), 30(2), 16(2), 31; First Schedule of the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 - Articles 112(3)(d)(iii), 217(1), 221 and 224A; Madhya Pradesh Consumer Protection Rules, 1987; Constitution Of India - Article 136; Madras Race Club (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1986

Disputes Redressal Commission, Madhya Pradesh (for short, 'State Commission') established under clause (b) of Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ( for short, '1986 Act'). The respondent assumed office on September 21, 1998 and continued to hold that … in the prescribed form and submitted to the office of the Accountant General, Madhya Pradesh (appellant) on August 29, 2003 by the Registrar of the State Commission. The Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, Government

Smt. Jyoti Sharma Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority, Through Its ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

MRF Ltd. Vs. Goa MRF Employees' Union and Anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 9, 10, 10(4), 11(3), 33 and 33A

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ394Bom

the Act.20. In Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund (supra), the Apex Court noted that under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, there was no power under Section 14 to grant any interim relief or even ad interim relief and … the only other provision under the Act is criminal prosecution for failure to comply with the award considering Section 29. Apart from these provisions, there is no other provision under the Act by which the Tribunal can enforce

Shanthiniketan Housing Foundation (A) Registered Partnership Firm) Rep ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 25, 27, 27A, 27(1), 27(2), 27(3), 29, 37(1), 40 and 40(1); Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(1) and 21; Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4, 6, 173, 200(1), 200(2), 207, 227, 238 to 240, 242, 248, 251 to 258, 260, 262, 262(2), 263, 264, 265, 289, 325, 360 and 494; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1892 - Sections 349 and 562; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1872 - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2589; 2009(6)KarLJ205

all these Writ Petitions the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of Section 27(2) and (3) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter far short referred to as the Act') as well as the procedure followed by the District and … or Section 51 read with Order 21 Rule 37 of Code of Civil Procedure. It was held that Section 29 should be read in conjunction with Section 27. A parliamentary statute indisputably can create a tribunal and might

C.V. Ratnam Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 9-A, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(4), (5) and (6), 14, 14(2) and (2-A), 15, 16, 18, 18-A, 19, 20, 20(3), 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29-A and 113; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 32, 141, 141(3), 143(1), 226, 227, 323-A and 323-B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 51; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 1(2) and 5; Companies Act, 1956; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993; RBI Act - Sections 45Q, 48-QA and 58-A(9); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 41

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD35; 2001(5)ALT610; [2002]108CompCas469(AP)

(d), (e), (f), (g), Sections 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24(b) and 25 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the said Act') whereas in the other writ petitions the vires of Section 27 of the … 14 may support the view taken by the National Commission but if these provisions are read with Section 29A of the Act and sub-rules (9) and (10) of Rule 6, it wouldbe quite clear that it could