Advanced Search Results

Smt. N. Taneja and Another Vs. Calcutta Distt. Forum and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 1, 2, 2(O)(2), 10, 10(1), 13, 13(5), 14(2), 15, 19, 23, 27 and 28;; West Bangal Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Rules 3(5), 3(7), 3(8), 5(4), 5(5), 5(10) and 8(8);; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 226, 227 and 245;; Management of Recognised Non-Government Institutions Rules, 1969 - Rule 28;; West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 28(8);; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 13(4), 30 and 32;; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228;; Arbitration Act - Sections 4(6) and 41;; Benaras Hindu University Act, 1915;; Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920;; Viswa Bharati University Act, 1951 - Section 3;; Contract Act - Section 2;

Reported in : AIR1992Cal95,(1992)1CALLT234(HC)

before the Calcutta District Forum as well as the notice to show cause under Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The petitioners prayed for quashing the plaint filed by Mr. Barmecha and the ad interim order dated 20th … of the Forum and challenged the preceding of the Forum which could not be done in view of Section 28 of the Act; the writ petition is not maintainable because the writ petitioners have questioned the authority of

KaisaroddIn S/O JahiroddIn Vs. the Divisional Caste Verification and S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 6, 7, 7(1), 10, 10(4), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12 and 16; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Rules; Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Se

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR1080; 2009(1)Bom.C.R.(Cri.)466

done or intended to be done in pursuance of that Act or any rules made thereunder. Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, we find similar provision in Section 28. In the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, we find similar protection

B.Venu Madhav, So.Late Sri B.Mohan Rao Vs. National Consumer Disputes ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 15, 21(b), 20, 21, 23, 24, 11, 15, 17, 28; Constitution of India - Article 226

as barred by limitation. Aggrieved by the same, the second respondent filed appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the Act) being F.A.No.216 of 2006 before the learned Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (the … for judicial review before a High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court read down Section 28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, as not excluding the jurisdiction of the High Court to entertain a

Harminder Kaur and Another Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority Thr ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Rsg Share and Stock Brokers Ltd. Vs. Anju Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 30, 31 and 34; National Stock Exchange of India Limited Capital Market Regulations, 1999 - Regulation 5.13; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 28(2); Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Reported in : 2002IIAD(Delhi)603; 96(2002)DLT749; 2002(64)DRJ345; 2002(2)RAJ595

to the arbitrator which the Supreme Court held to be impermissible as there was no provision in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 permitting the National Commission to adopt such a course. This is what the Supreme Court observed: '..... The … respondent No. 1. It is this award which is challenged by the petitioner by filing the instantpetition under Section 34 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act').3. Before we proceed to take note of … As an adjudicator, he had to decide according to law. However, Section 28(2) of the new Act recognized such a power with the arbitrator provided

Lt. Col. Anil Bhat, Vs. Citibank, N.A. (a National Banking Association ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Bank and Financial Institution Act, 1993 - Sections 19 and 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 22(2) - Order 7, Rule 10; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Limitation Act - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR2009Bom99; 2009(3)BomCR808; 2009(4)BomLR1490

Stanley Mutual Fund v. Kartick Das : (1994)4SCC225 . There the Court was considering Section 14 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which section did not provide for grant of any interim relief or even ad-interim relief and provided only … v. Gorakhram Gokalchand : [1964]3SCR214 .The issue before the Supreme Court was whether on a proper interpretation of Section 28 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 the Court of Small Causes, Bombay,

M/S Metarock (Pvt)ltd., Kollam, Repd. by Its Managing Director, Venodl ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

V. Anil Kumar Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by Its Chief Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9 to 27A, 27(1), 27(2), 27(3) and 30A; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 9 to 21, 32 and 32(1); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(2); Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 - Regulation 24

Reported in : AIR2008Mad56; (2007)6MLJ1777

a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent-State Government, to issue necessary Notification under Section 27(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, conferring powers upon the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forums and the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in the … Two Mahila Courts were constituted by the State Government, by a Notification issued in G.O.Ms. No. 556 dated 28.06.2002. The High Court appointed Judicial Officers to those Mahila Courts by Notifications issued in exercise of the powers

Secretary Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Chirawa Jhunjhun (Rajasthan) Vs. Sm ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Sharp Business Systems India Ltd. Vs. Guru Sewak Singh Hooda and Anoth ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC