Advanced Search Results

Smt. Savita Garg Vs. the Director, National Heart Institute

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConsumerCivil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 13, 13(4), 13(5), 13(6), 14(1) and 22; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rules 8, 9, 10 and 10(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; ;Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Rule 14 and 14(1); Public Health Act, 1936

Reported in : AIR2004SC5088; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)42; 2004(4)AWC3699(SC); 2004(3)BLJR2145; 2005(3)BomCR430; (2004)4CompLJ255(SC); IV(2004)CPJ40(SC); [2005(1)JCR22(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC607; 2004(3; (2004) 8 SCC 56

the original petition be dismissed on the ground of non-joinder of necessary party. As per the provisions of Section 22 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the Commission has to regulate its … on the part of the Institute. An objection was also taken that the provisions as contained in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 do not satisfy the requirement of a complaint as defined under the Act as it does not disclose

Chief Executive Officer and Vice-chairman, Gujarat Maritime Board Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(4), 13(5), 13(6), 14(1), 21 and 22

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)453; [1997]89CompCas710(SC); JT1996(11)SC43; 1996(8)SCALE608; (1996)11SCC23; [1996]Supp8SCR839

into and decide the rival claims of the appellant and Haji Abu in a complaint filed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. In our opinion such a power must be held available to the Commission as a power incidental or … services and compensation, if any, claimed exceeds rupees [twenty lakhs]; and....10. This provision has to be read alongwith Section 22 which clothes the Commission with the powers of a civil court specified in Sub-sections (4), (5) and (6)

Philip Thomas and anr. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 20, 21, 22, 165, 229, 319, 320(3), 235 and 390; Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - Sections 2(1), 12, 17, 18 and 21 to 29; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 10; Protection of Human Rights Rules - Rule 3

Reported in : (2002)1MLJ1

which is to be computed, has got no relevance to the independent functions to be discharged under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.9. In view of what is slated supra, we hold that holding of office of a Member of the … Arivudai Nambi have not projected the said facts, but based their arguments only on the Constitutional bar under Section 319(d) of the Constitution.3. Mr. T.S. Sasikumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that once a person occupies … the power of the Chief Justice of a High Court under Article 229 of the Constitution, which empowers him to appoint the High Court staff

Sharp Business Systems India Ltd. Vs. Guru Sewak Singh Hooda and Anoth ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Skypak Couriers Ltd. Vs. Tata Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConsumerArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940; ;Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 22; Conciliation Act, 1996

Reported in : AIR2000SC2008; 2000(3)BLJR1681; [2000]102CompCas403(SC); 2000(3)CTC246; JT2000(6)SC560; (2000)3MLJ74(SC); 2000(4)SCALE580; (2000)6SCC236; [2000]Supp1SCR324

passed in Civil Appeal No. 2500 of 1994) is reproduced below: Consumer - award - Section 22 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Commission under Act do not have jurisdiction to refer dispute for consensual adjudication and then make said

Lufthansa German Airlines Vs. Sunil Kothari and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

ici India Limited Vs. Dr. Sunil Chawla and Another

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Arvind Sahni Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 22

Reported in : (2001)10SCC614

which had required the appellant to furnish the indemnity bond. - [B.N. Kirpal and; Ruma Pal, JJ.] - Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section. 22 - Practice and Procedure - Indemnity bond - Order to furnish, when unjustified - Cheque

M/S. Mehta Build Con. Limited Through Its Director Vinod Mehta Vs. Kan ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Jaipur Onkara Transport Corporation Vs. Gautam Kankariya

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC