Advanced Search Results

Krishna and Another Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

indus Videotronics and anr. Vs. Digambar M. Badodkar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 - Sections 33, 33(1), 51, 51(1) and 53; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6 and 6(1); Copyright Act - Sections 52A and 52A(2); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Central Excise Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Kerala General Sales-Tax Act

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)2009

be made in this connection to the definition of the word 'consumer' given in section 2(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. According to the said definition a consumer is a person who buys any goods for a consideration or

Jeet Singh Bisht Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConsumerElectricity

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 10, 11 and 16; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 254

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC22

which must have to be met by the State Government keeping in line with the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Since the Central Government also happens to be directly connected with many of the activities under the provisions … at State Level and at District Level and to make the working of the Consumer Forum effectively under Sections 10 and 16 of the Consumer Protection Act, as the Court was not satisfied with the stats of … and he deposited charges from April, 1992 to August, 1994, i.e., Rs. 26.053.80 paise and requested the authorities to correct the bills from April. 1992

Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust Vs. Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act 1993

Reported in : AIR1999SC3356; 1999(3)CTC452; JT1999(8)SC210; (1999)123PLR707; 1999(6)SCALE534; (2000)1SCC512; [1999]Supp3SCR619; 2000(1)LC89(SC)

the contention that the appellant was a 'consumer' within the meaning of the definition set out in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The definition was considered by us and it was held that since the machinery in question was installed … person has bought goods is a 'commercial purpose' within the meaning of the definition of expression 'consumer' in Section 2(d) of the Act is always a question of fact to be decided in the facts and circumstances of

Housing Board, Haryana Vs. Housing Board Colony Welfare Association an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 15; Haryana Consumer Protection Rules (1988) - Sections 30, Rules 4(10) and 8; Housing Board Haryana (Allotment Management and Sale of Tenements) Regulations, 1972 - Sections 11(4)

Reported in : AIR1996SC92; [1996]87CompCas898(SC); JT1995(6)SC293; 1995(5)SCALE89; (1995)5SCC672; [1995]Supp3SCR219

with law. No order as to costs. Consumer - period of limitation - Sections 2 and 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 30 and Rules 4 (10) and 8 of Haryana Consumer Protection Rules, 1988 and Section 11 (4) of

Smt. Savita Garg Vs. the Director, National Heart Institute

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConsumerCivil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 13, 13(4), 13(5), 13(6), 14(1) and 22; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rules 8, 9, 10 and 10(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; ;Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Rule 14 and 14(1); Public Health Act, 1936

Reported in : AIR2004SC5088; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)42; 2004(4)AWC3699(SC); 2004(3)BLJR2145; 2005(3)BomCR430; (2004)4CompLJ255(SC); IV(2004)CPJ40(SC); [2005(1)JCR22(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC607; 2004(3; (2004) 8 SCC 56

on the part of the Institute. An objection was also taken that the provisions as contained in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 do not satisfy the requirement of a complaint as defined under the Act as it does not disclose … Where the complainant is a consumer referred to in Sub-clause (iv) of Clause (b) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2, the provisions of Rule 8 of Order 1 of the First Schedule to the Code of Civil Procedure,

Kishore Lal Vs. Chairman, Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 38, 39, 40, 40(2), 46, 46(1), 55A, 56, 59, 68, 70, 74, 75, 75(1), 75(2), 75(3) and 95; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1); Employees' Provident Fund Act - Sections 5; Employees' State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 56, 57, 58, 60 and 61

Reported in : AIR2007SC1819; 2007(4)ALD36(SC); 2007(3)AWC3082(SC); 2007(2)BLJR1653; 2007BusLRSN-2(SC); (2007)2CompLJ385(SC); I(2008)CPJ13(SC); 2007(3)CTC561; [2007(114)FLR219]; [2007(3)J; 2007LawHerald(SC)1696

the appellant's wife was a direct result of the wrong diagnosis. The appellant filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CP Act') before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking (i) compensation towards … also raised the question of the jurisdiction of a consumer forum. The respondent contended that by virtue of Section 75 of the ESI Act, the dispute raised by the appellant is covered and is to be decided … this appeal by special leave.3. By second counter affidavit filed in August, 2000, the respondent-Corporation have also raised the question of the jurisdiction of a

A.V. Georgekutty Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 9 and 26

Reported in : AIR1994Ker19; [1995]83CompCas772(Ker)

dated 26-11-1992 issued by the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Kottayam to the petitioner under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 and further for the issue of a writ of prohibition restraining the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum from proceeding … P. 891 of 1992 before the District Forum claiming compensation on the ground that they were 'consumers' within Section 2(d) of the Act. The writ petitioners filed two counter affidavits (Exts. P 6 and P 7) and the

Kerala State Co-op. Employees' Pension Board Vs. Consumer Disputes Red ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1); Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 80A

Reported in : AIR2004Ker57; 2004(1)KLT111

A.K. Basheer, J.1. Does the Kerala State Co-operative Employees Pension Board come within the purview of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986? This is the short question that has been raised in this Original Petition.2. Respondent No. 2 was an … Board has received any consideration from him for providing the service of disbursing the pension under the Scheme.7. Section 2(1)(o) of the Consumer Protection Act defines 'service' as under:'2(l)(o) 'Service' means service of any description which is made

General Manager, Telecom District, Trivandrum and ors. Vs. Consumer Di ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 3(1), 3(4), 7 and 7B; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1); Telegraph Rules, 1951 - Rules 413 and 443

Reported in : AIR2000Ker250

not maintainable and hence the Forum should have dismissed the same as provided under Section 26 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, hereinafter referred to as 'the Consumer Protection Act'. In the writ petition filed before this Court several contentions … 2476). (f) The learned single Judge has also failed to appreciate the fact that the deficiency clause under Section 2(1)(g) of the Consumer Protection Act cannot be attracted on account of disconnection of telephone hired by the second