Advanced Search Results

Krishna and Another Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Dr. J.J. Merchant and ors. Vs. Shrinath Chaturvedi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201, 203 and 304A; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 12, 13, 13(3A), 13(4), 20(1), 20(1A), 20(1B), 22C, 22D and 24B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 14 - Order 8, Rule 1 and 1A - Order 18, Rule 4; Consumer Protection Rules - Rule 14

Reported in : AIR2002SC2931; 2002(5)ALD43(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)605; 2002(4)AWC2865(SC); 2002(3)BLJR1899; (SCSuppl)2002(4)CHN6; (2002)4CompLJ145(SC); III(2002)CPJ8(SC); [2002(3)JCR137(SC); (2002) 6 SCC 635

accepted, apart from the fact that it would be unjust, the whole purpose and object of enacting the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') would be frustrated. One of the main objects of the Act is … Commission, the complainant had also filed criminal complaint before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Bombay for the offences punishable under Sections 304-A/201 and 203 of Indian Penal Code. That prosecution is also pending. The Commission rejected the application by … to as 'National Commission'), New Delhi in Original Petition No. 252 of 1993 by the appellants-doctors praying that complaint filed for alleged medical negligence be

C.V. Ratnam Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 9-A, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(4), (5) and (6), 14, 14(2) and (2-A), 15, 16, 18, 18-A, 19, 20, 20(3), 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29-A and 113; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 32, 141, 141(3), 143(1), 226, 227, 323-A and 323-B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 37 - Order 39, Rule 2A; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 51; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 1(2) and 5; Companies Act, 1956; Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993; RBI Act - Sections 45Q, 48-QA and 58-A(9); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 41

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD35; 2001(5)ALT610; [2002]108CompCas469(AP)

(d), (e), (f), (g), Sections 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24(b) and 25 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the said Act') whereas in the other writ petitions the vires of Section 27 of the … true that subsection (2) of Section 14 read with Section 18 requires that every proceedings referred to under sub-section (1) shall be conducted by the President of the District Forum/State Commission and at least one member thereof sitting

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Bhavani

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 2(1); Employees' Provident Funds and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952; Employees' Pension Scheme Act, 1995

Reported in : AIR2008SC2957; [2008(118)FLR415]; JT2008(6)SC56; 2008(3)KLT789(SC); (2008)IILLJ1079SC; (2009)1MLJ931(SC); 2008(6)SCALE773; (2008)7SCC111; 2009(2)SLJ346(SC); 2008(2)LC688(SC); 2008LABIC3565; 2008AIRSCW4974

the appellant herein before the District Forum by filing a counter affidavit wherein it was contended that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, would have no application to a claim made under the Employees' Provident Funds and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952 … as 'the 1952 Act'), inasmuch as, Bhavani, the respondent herein, was not a 'consumer' within the meaning of Section 2(d) of the Act.6. It was also contended on behalf of the appellant herein that Bhavani was a … hearing along with five other matters, namely, Special Leave Petition (C) No. 15469 of 2005, Special Leave Petition (C) No. 16573 of 2006, Special Leave

T.Xavier Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 10(1A), 16(1)(a), 30, 4, 20; Kerala Consumer Protection Rules, 2005 - Rule 7, 17(1)(2)(3) ; Tamil Nadu Consumer Protection Rules, 1988 ; Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Rule 12-A(4); Central Rules ; State Rules ; Service Rules

Forum vide Notification No.1/2011 dated 07.01.2011 by way of Direct Recruitment as provided under Section 10(1A) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, in short, the Act. Only retired Judges were notified as eligible candidates and they must not have completed

S.P. Goel Vs. Collector of Stamps, Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MiscellaneousConsumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 86; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 33(1); Merchant Shipping Act, 1894; Indian Registration of Ships Act, 1841 - Sections 38, 40, 45, 56, 60, 61, 68, 69, 72 and 77; Judges (Protection) Act, 1985; Judicial Officers (Protection) Act, 1850;

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)154; AIR1996SC839; 1996(1)CTC551; JT1995(9)SC545; 1995(7)SCALE174; (1996)1SCC573; [1995]Supp6SCR340

passed by the National Consumer Redressal Commission. New Delhi, where by the complaint of the appellant under the Consumer Protection Act. 1986 was dismissed on the ground that the District Consumer Forum as also the State Commission had no jurisdiction … if he thinks fit, remit the whole penalty prescribed by this section.(2) Every certificate under Clause (a) of Sub-section (1), shall, for the purpose of this Act, be conclusive evidence of the matters stated therein.(3) Where an instrument

indus Videotronics and anr. Vs. Digambar M. Badodkar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 - Sections 33, 33(1), 51, 51(1) and 53; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6 and 6(1); Copyright Act - Sections 52A and 52A(2); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Central Excise Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Kerala General Sales-Tax Act

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)2009

be made in this connection to the definition of the word 'consumer' given in section 2(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. According to the said definition a consumer is a person who buys any goods for a consideration or … the prosecutions lodged against the petitioners under the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 and the Rules made thereunder in the Metropolitan Magistrates Courts in Greater Mumbai. Since in all the petitions

Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs. Kartick Das

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConsumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 14

Reported in : (1994)96BOMLR933; (1995)1CALLT18(SC); [1994]81CompCas318(SC); JT1994(3)SC654; 1994(2)SCALE1121; (1994)4SCC225; [1994]Supp1SCR136; MANU/SC/0553/1994

fund) urges the following :(a) A prospective investor is not a consumer to prefer a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). If that be so, a voluntary consumer association cannot complain about the … voluntary consumer association cannot complain about the issue of shares. The shares are not goods as defined under Section 2(i) of the Act. Even otherwise, there can be no consumer association of prospective applicants for future properties. … S. Mohan, J. 1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is a domestic mutual fund registered with Securities

Economic Transport Organization Vs. Charan Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConsumerInsurance

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 14(1); ;Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 8 and 9; ;Consumer Protection Act, 1988 - Section 2; ;Limitation Act - Section 14; ;Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Section 79; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 140; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 6 and 130; ;Stamp Act; ;Insurance Law

Reported in : JT2010(2)SC271,2010(2)SCALE427,2010(2)LC1004(SC)

in favour of the second respondent on 15.2.1996. Thereafter, respondents 1 and 2 filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ('Act' for short) against the appellant before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dindigul, claiming compensation of Rs. … in sound condition was a deficiency in service, in view of the unrebutted presumption of negligence arising under Sections 8 and 9 of the Carriers Act, 1865. The appeal filed by the appellant before the State Consumer

Shri Ashok Tanwar and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9, 10, 16, 16(1), 20 and 20(1); Constitution of India - Articles 124(2), 145(3), 217, 217(1), 223 and 224; S.P. Gupta v. Union of India, 1981 Supp. SCC 87

Reported in : AIR2005SC614; 2005(4)ALD34(SC); 2005(1)BLJR665; (SCSuppl)2005(2)CHN34; (2005)3CompLJ118(SC); I(2005)CPJ21(SC); 2005(1)CTC288; [2005(104)FLR523]; [2005(2)JCR143(SC)]; (2005)

Commission) on 4.3.2000, after attaining the age of 67 years. In accordance with the provisions contained in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the Act'), a person who is or has been a Judge of High Court can be … of this Court made the following order of reference on 7th March, 2002: -'In the present case, under Section 16 of the Consumer Protection Act, the President of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has to be … of reference on 7th March, 2002: -'In the present case, under Section 16 of the Consumer Protection Act, the President of the State Consumer Disputes