Advanced Search Results

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Regulation and Development Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha in 2013. Noticing the fact that though the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is available as a Forum in the real estate market for the buyers, the recourse is only curative … following persons shall not be entitled to make an application to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process under this Chapter, namely: - (a) a corporate debtor undergoing a corporate insolvency resolution process; or (b) a corporate debtor having … [be responsible for complying with the requirements under any law for the 87 time being in force on behalf of the corporate debtor.73. Section 17

Sham Lal Vs. State Election Commission, Chandigarh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Election

Acts : Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 10, 11(1), 13, 13-G and 101; Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 - Sections 73 to 107 and 108; ; Constitution of India - Article 243, 243-B, 243-C, 243-D, 243-E, 243-F, 243-G, 243-H, 243-I, 243-J, 243-K, 243-L, 243-M, 243-N and 243-O; Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39; Evidence Act, 1872; Representation of the People Act, 1951; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR1997P& H164; (1997)115PLR687

Supreme Court on the power of the Consumer Forums to grant stay order in the proceedings under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. In Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund v. Kartick Das, 1994 AIR SCW 2801, their Lordships held that the Forum … to the constitution of Gram Panchayats and S. 13 of it deals with oath of Panches and Sarpanches. Chapter XII of '1994 Act' relates to election petitions. For the purposes of deciding the question posed by us … and 13 of the Panchayati Raj Act and Ss. 73, 75, 81, 87, 88, 89, 94 and 101 of. '1994 Act' which read as under:--'Constitution

Mylan Laboratories Limited vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

taken from the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Bill, 2001 which brought in a change to the scheme of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by adding Sub-Section (1B) to Section 16 and Sub-Section (1A) to 20, which empowers the President of the … of Copyright is lying vacant till date. V. Plant Varieties Protection Appellate Tribunal 1. As per provisions of Chapter VI Section 54(II) PPV&FR Act, 2001, the Plant Varieties Protection Appellate Tribunal having judicial powers to dispose of … Act 1970 the provisions of sub section (2) to (6) Sections 84, 87, 92, 95, 96 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, shall apply to the

NitIn Shankar Deshpande Vs. the President of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

vs. Ajoy Khose (supra). In that case, the Supreme Court considered the provisions of Section 16 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which provides that the State Commission shall consist of a person who is or has been a Judge … before any Authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.224. Notwithstanding anything in this chapter, the Chief Justice of a High Court for any state may at any time, with previous consent of … High Court. Since the decision in S.P.Guptavs. Union of India,(1981 (Supp) SCC 87)the Supreme Court has taken note of the fact that since 1956, the

M/s Newtech Promoters And Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs. The State Of Uttar P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

for enforced accountability towards builders and developers in the absence of an effective mechanism in place. Though, The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 5 was available to cater the demand of home buyers in the real estate sector but the experience … is beneficial not only to the home buyers but to the promoters and real estate agents as well.15. Chapter II of the Act relates to the registration of real estate projects. Section 3 mandates prior registration of … the case, subject to such conditions as it deems necessary to impose.” 87 134. Similarly, the condition of pre­deposit has been examined recently by this

Sushil Kumar Das and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)(92)SLJ179CAT

appointment of a District Judge, after his superannuation as the President of the District Consumer Forum under the Consumer Protection Act, cannot but be held to be a case of re-employment of a pensioner inasmuch as the said District … Tribunal but were appointed afresh in tenure service and, therefore, CCS (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986, have no application in their case. According to them, they were fresh appointees to an independent Judicial Service … in the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume II. Since Section 2.1 of Chapter II of Volume II, unequivocally states that every pension shall be held

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Reported in : 2002(83)ECC85; 1997(89)ELT247(SC); JT1996(11)SC283; 1996(9)SCALE457; (1997)5SCC536; [1996]Supp10SCR585; [1998]111STC467(SC)

Equipment of all kinds (Chapter 86). This Entry is followed by Vehicles other than Railway or tramway etc. (Chapter 87). This Entry includes motor cars, motor vehicles, tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles and also parts and accessories … 11B(2) of the Act the duty collected will be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund and the said Fund will be utilised as per Section … of taxes collected by the States is by indirect levies, the constitutional protection against unlawful taxes will become meaningless and devoid of any substance.6. Mr. … be issued retrospectively, an Act was passed to help the manufacturers.126. The Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act. 1986 was passed on 8th September, 1986 to give retrospective effect to certain notifications to enable the excise authorities

Gujarat Water Pollution Control Board Vs. Kohinoor Dyeing and Printing ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Environment

Reported in : (1993)2GLR1368

AIR (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981;(II) Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; And(III) Environment Protection Act, 1986.Pending as on 1st April, 1993 in the subordinate Courts of the State. __________________________________________________________________________________________Name of the AIR ACT, … the AIR ACT, 1981 | WATER ACT, 1974----------------------------- -- |---------------------------------------Court 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 Total| 85 86 87 88 89 90 … Session Court, thereafter the High Court, and finally the Supreme Court, if the matter is to go on consuming time, at every stage, this painful lingering process could as well aggravate the problem of pollution still further, … the relevant provisions contained in between Section 61 to 90 prescribed in Chapter-VI of the Code which pertains to the 'Processes to Compel Appearance' and

Rajasthan State Electricity Board Vs. Trilok Chand

Court : Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Jaipur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Jaipur

M/S. Kranti Associates Pvt. Ltd. and anr.Vs. Sh. Masood Ahmed Khan and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConsumerProtection

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9(c), 12, 13, 13(5), 14 20, 20(k), 21 (1)(a),21(1)(b),22, 22(1) 23; Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Section 111(3)

affirming the order of the State Commission.5. The said Commission has been defined under Section 2(k) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter CP Act) as follows:"2(k) "National Commission" means the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission established under clause (c) … the said Commission shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure.14. The above provisions make it clear that the said Commission has … Union of India vs. Mohan Lal Capoor and others, AIR 1974 SC 87, this Court while dealing with the question of selection under Indian Administrative