Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: consumer protection act 1986 chapter 80 · Page 1 of about 76 results (0.033 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 19 2021

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Regulation and Development Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha in 2013. Noticing the fact that though the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is available as a Forum in the real estate market for the buyers, the recourse is only curative … following persons shall not be entitled to make an application to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process under this Chapter, namely: - (a) a corporate debtor undergoing a corporate insolvency resolution process; or (b) a corporate debtor having … days from the date of commencement of the Amending Act of 2019 80 is exceeded, there again a discretion can be exercised by the Adjudicating

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2021

M/s Newtech Promoters And Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs. The State Of Uttar P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

for enforced accountability towards builders and developers in the absence of an effective mechanism in place. Though, The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 5 was available to cater the demand of home buyers in the real estate sector but the experience … is beneficial not only to the home buyers but to the promoters and real estate agents as well.15. Chapter II of the Act relates to the registration of real estate projects. Section 3 mandates prior registration of … the Act at a given time, several onerous duties and obligations have 80 been imposed on the promoters i.e. registration, duties of promoters, obligations of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2006

Hotel and Restaurant Assocn. and anr. Vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-24-2006

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 4A and 4A(9); Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 14, 18 and 36; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1) and 9; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; Copyright Act; Sales Tax Act; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947; Cotton Textiles Cess Act, 1948; Cotton Textiles Companies (Management of Undertakings and Liquidation or Reconstruction) Act, 1967; The Register of Interconnect Agreements (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Regulations, 2004

Reported in : AIR2007SC1168; (2007)1CompLJ46(SC); 2006(12)SCALE543; 2007[5]STR161

using cable television cannot be treated as subscribers. (iv) In view of the definition of 'consumer' contained in Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the 1986 Act'), the users for commercial purposes having been excluded, members of Appellants - Associations … and associated signal generation, control and distribution equipment, designed to provide cable service for reception by multiple subscribers;3. Chapter II of the 1995 Act provides for cable television network to be operated only upon registration thereof. Section … Restaurant Owners Association (Western India) also filed a similar application bearing No. 80(C) of 2005. Indisputably, on 4.04.2005, an interim order directing maintenance of 'status

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 17 2007

Municipal Corporation of Kurnool Rep. by Its Commissioner, Smt. K. Vij ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 2A(2), 2(OO), 4K, 10, 10(1), 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(4), 22, 25F and 33C; Andhra Pradesh Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1987; Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1988; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1965; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(2); Representation of the People Act, 1951; Uttar Pradesh Sugar Factories Control Act, 1938 - Sections 18(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 80(3) - Order 8, Rule 1; Andhra Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958 - Rules 9, 10, 11, 11(6), 73, 73(1), 73(2), 73(4) and 74; Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules - Rule 3

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD173; 2007(2)ALT386; [2007(114)FLR253]

Bank AIR 2002 SC 2487 the Supreme Court considered whether the time frame provided under Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was mandatory and whether reply filed beyond 45 days was liable to be discarded and held:The intention to … the Supreme Court, after considering the definition of the expression 'industrial dispute', the word 'settlement', the provisions of Chapter II of the Act and making reference to the large number of judicial precedents, culled out the following … question whether a suit filed without serving notice in accordance with Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure was maintainable and answered the same

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2021

Lok Prahari Through Its General Secretary S.n.shukla I.a.s. (retd) Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-20-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

was actually no real discussion on Article 224A. What was in question was whether Section 16 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, (which requires the State to appoint a person in consultation with the Chief Justice of the State) a … the essential aspects of our Constitution has been the separation of powers between the Judiciary, Executive, and Legislature.3. Chapter V of Part VI of the Constitution of India commencing from Article 214 upto Article 231 relates to … the Constitution has the jurisdiction to try an election petition under Section 80-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Debate arose in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2014

Krishna Chaitanya Gondi Vs. M/S. Hill County Properties Ltd. and Other ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Feb-12-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2012

Sudhakar Kasireddy and Another Vs. M/S. Maytas Properties Ltd. Rep. by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Oct-19-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2005

Sushil Kumar Das and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-11-2005

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)(92)SLJ179CAT

appointment of a District Judge, after his superannuation as the President of the District Consumer Forum under the Consumer Protection Act, cannot but be held to be a case of re-employment of a pensioner inasmuch as the said District … Tribunal but were appointed afresh in tenure service and, therefore, CCS (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986, have no application in their case. According to them, they were fresh appointees to an independent Judicial Service … in the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume II. Since Section 2.1 of Chapter II of Volume II, unequivocally states that every pension shall be held … pension equivalent or other forms of retirement benefits does not exceed Rs. 8000 per month (unrevised). It may be noted that now it has been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2000

K.K. Gupta Vs. New High Flying Travels Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Aug-07-2000

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2008

Magus Construction Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-15-2008

Subject : Service Tax

service free of charge or under a contract of personal service.27. The term 'service', as defined under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, reads as under:'service' means service of any description which is made available to potential users and includes the … manner as may be prescribed at the rate specified in Section 66 and all the provisions of this chapter shall apply to such person as if he is the person liable for paying the service tax in … year 2005, the Central Board of Excise and Customs, vide Circular No. 80/10/2004, dated September 17, 2004, clarified that 'estate builders', who construct buildings/premises for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial