Advanced Search Results

Forum For Peoples Collective Efforts (fpce) Vs. The State Of West Beng ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

largely unregulated. There is, thus, absence of professionalism and standardization and lack of adequate consumer protection. Though the Consumer Protection Act 1986 is available as a forum to the buyers in the real estate market, the recourse is only curative … type of use ancillary to the purpose specified;” (iii) The provisions of the RERA are comprised in ten Chapters. Broadly, the division is as follows: Chapter I Preliminary Chapter II Registration of Real Estate Projects and Registration … and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those 68 PART E Section and Title Provision Section and Title of WB-HIRA of

M/s Newtech Promoters And Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs. The State Of Uttar P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

for enforced accountability towards builders and developers in the absence of an effective mechanism in place. Though, The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 5 was available to cater the demand of home buyers in the real estate sector but the experience … is beneficial not only to the home buyers but to the promoters and real estate agents as well.15. Chapter II of the Act relates to the registration of real estate projects. Section 3 mandates prior registration of … adjudication. Various kinds of penalties are set out in Sections 59 to 68. Each of these provisions clearly states that the penalty thereunder is required

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; (c) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in sub-section (1) of section 7B of … the order, such of its powers and functions under this Act (except the power to settle dispute under Chapter IV and to make regulation under section36) as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The

Kishore Lal Vs. Chairman, Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 38, 39, 40, 40(2), 46, 46(1), 55A, 56, 59, 68, 70, 74, 75, 75(1), 75(2), 75(3) and 95; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1); Employees' Provident Fund Act - Sections 5; Employees' State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 56, 57, 58, 60 and 61

Reported in : AIR2007SC1819; 2007(4)ALD36(SC); 2007(3)AWC3082(SC); 2007(2)BLJR1653; 2007BusLRSN-2(SC); (2007)2CompLJ385(SC); I(2008)CPJ13(SC); 2007(3)CTC561; [2007(114)FLR219]; [2007(3)J; 2007LawHerald(SC)1696

the appellant's wife was a direct result of the wrong diagnosis. The appellant filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CP Act') before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking (i) compensation towards … to recover the contribution made for the employee by deducting the same from the wages of the employee. Chapter V of the ESI Act deals with benefits. Sub-section (1) of Section 46 falling within this Chapter contemplates … and all patients are given free service (vide para 55(6) at page 681) and services rendered at Government Hospital/Health center/Dispensary where no charge whatsoever is

Escotel Mobile Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Telecom Authority of India Ordinance, 1997 - Sections 14(2)

Reported in : 1997(43)DRJ582

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission established under Section 9 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (c) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in Sub-section (1) of … respondent Union of India, being Government, are covered under the definition of `service provider'. (8) The heading of Chapter Iv of the Ordinance is `Settlement of Disputes'. Section 14 in this Chapter has the heading 'Authority to

Society of Catalysts Vs. Vodaphone Essar Mobile Services Limited.

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Loop Telecom And Trading Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (C) the dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in sub-section (1) … purpose and object for which the Appellate Tribunal was constituted and having examined the different provisions contained in Chapter IV, more particularly, the provision dealing with ousting the jurisdiction of the civil court in relation to any

Bharti Cellular Limited Vs. Department of Tele-communicaitons

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (C) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in sub-section (1) of … (‘TRAI Amendment Act’) came into force with retrospective effect from 24th January 2000. The TRAI Amendment Act inserted Chapter IV in the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (‘TRAI Act’). Under Section 14 of the TRAI

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

this Act: Provided that the complaints of individual consumers maintainable before a consumer disputes redressal forum under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986) shall not be taken up by the Board but shall be heard and disposed of … storage, transporation, distribution, marketing and sale of petroleum, petroleum products and natural gas according to the provisions of Chapter V, unless the parties have agreed for arbitration; (b) receive any complaint from any person and conduct any

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (iii) Which are within the purview of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003); (iv) … Authority of India Act, 1997 (24 of 1997) shall, on and from the commencement of Part XIV of Chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017), be the Appellate Tribunal for the purposes of this