Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: consumer protection act 1986 chapter 60 · Page 1 of about 126 results (0.081 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 2006

Baldev Singh and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-27-2006

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 2006(3)ShimLC135

a notification dated 27.1.1994 in exercise of the powers vested in it under the provisions of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and the Rules framed thereunder for Environmental Impact Assessment of Development Projects.37. The relevant extracts of the Ministry … scale (1 cm = 2.5 km.) which means that micro-level details cannot be considered. It is also time consuming and expensive to carry out studies at regional level in a more detailed scale. The present study will … The observations with regard to Ranbaxy Laboratories in the Development Plan in Chapter-3 are as follows:3. Ranbaxy laboratories at Ganguwala has been well-established. There appears … Notification are as follows:MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOTIFICATIONS.O. 60(E), dated 27.1.1994xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx2. Requirements and procedure for seeking environmental clearance of projects:I(a): Any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2021

M/s Newtech Promoters And Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs. The State Of Uttar P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

for enforced accountability towards builders and developers in the absence of an effective mechanism in place. Though, The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 5 was available to cater the demand of home buyers in the real estate sector but the experience … is beneficial not only to the home buyers but to the promoters and real estate agents as well.15. Chapter II of the Act relates to the registration of real estate projects. Section 3 mandates prior registration of … be dealt with expeditiously as possible and to be disposed of within 60 days. If there is a delay being caused exceeding the statutory period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2012

Eurofinance Sa and Others Vs. RubIn and Others

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Oct-24-2012

Subject : MRTP

Canada. 58. By about 2005 TCT's business ceased after the Attorney General of Missouri brought proceedings under Missouri's consumer protection legislation which resulted in a settlement involving a payment by the trustees of US$1,650,000 and US$200,000 in costs. … Mr Irving Picard ("the trustee"), the trustee for the liquidation in the United States under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 ("SIPA") of Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities LLC ("Madoff"), which was Bernard Madoff's broking company. The … Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1030) ("CBIR")), which applies generally, or the assistance provisions of section 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986, which applies to a limited number of countries, including Australia. 2. In Rubin a judgment of the US … Inc [1993] BCLC 112 an English injunction against a Texas corporation in Chapter 11 proceedings was discharged; cf In re African Farms Ltd [1906] TS … each cashable voucher). About one half of the 60% balance received from merchants was paid to Eurofinance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 16 2011

Ewac Alloys Limited, Mumbai, Rep. by Its Head of Finance and Accounts ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-16-2011

Subject : MRTP

Vs. H.D. SHOURIE, (1999) 6 SCC 428, at paragraph 4 and 5 it held as under: 4. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been enacted to provide for better protection of the interests of the consumers by making provisions for … of law. 5. The Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (Act 60 of 1976) was enacted to establish standards of weights and measures, to … terms of the Rules, there is specific exemption for Industrial products. Rule 3 states that the provisions of Chapter-II, which are alleged to have been violated by the petitioners, apply to packages intended for retail sale. Rule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2008

Ajabrao Mahadeorao Choudhary Vs. the Principal, Kala Vanijya Mahavidya ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-27-2008

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 59(1); Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Administrative Act, 1985; Payment of Gratuity Act; Bombay Prohibition Act; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code; Bombay Stamp Act; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Indian Railways Act; Motor Vehicles Act; Small Causes (Enhancement of Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Amendment) Act, 1986; Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rules 1, 2, 4, 17, 18 and 18(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 227 and 228

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR33; 2008(6)MhLj436

the University and College Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, DART, the State of Maharashtra Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as well as the decision rendered by the Tribunal under the Administrative Act, 1985 should be challenged before … the order passed by the University and College Tribunal is covered by Clause (40) of Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules and amenable to the jurisdiction of the learned Single … professional course like Engineering or MBA etc. has an intake capacity of 60 seats which has duly been notified in the information brochure. However, after

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2007

Kishore Lal Vs. Chairman, Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2007

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 38, 39, 40, 40(2), 46, 46(1), 55A, 56, 59, 68, 70, 74, 75, 75(1), 75(2), 75(3) and 95; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1); Employees' Provident Fund Act - Sections 5; Employees' State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 56, 57, 58, 60 and 61

Reported in : AIR2007SC1819; 2007(4)ALD36(SC); 2007(3)AWC3082(SC); 2007(2)BLJR1653; 2007BusLRSN-2(SC); (2007)2CompLJ385(SC); I(2008)CPJ13(SC); 2007(3)CTC561; [2007(114)FLR219]; [2007(3)J; 2007LawHerald(SC)1696

the appellant's wife was a direct result of the wrong diagnosis. The appellant filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CP Act') before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking (i) compensation towards … to recover the contribution made for the employee by deducting the same from the wages of the employee. Chapter V of the ESI Act deals with benefits. Sub-section (1) of Section 46 falling within this Chapter contemplates … Laxman Thamappa Kotgiri v. G.M. Central Railway and Ors. 2005 (1) Scale 600, where an employee of the railways had filed a complaint on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2021

Sachu Rajan Eapen vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-16-2021

another was relied upon, which was a case, in which the power of the Consumer Forums under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, was considered and accordingly held that it is abundantly clear that the Tribunals are creatures of the statute … interpretation and keeping in mind that special connotation acquired by the word 'cognizance'. Once that interpretation is accepted, Chapter XXXVI along with the heading has to be understood in that light. The rule of purposive construction can … 59 SASIREKHA KALIKA HOUSE, KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 60 BIJESH B.JOSE KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 61 USHA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2021

P.K.Biju @ Varghese P.K., vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-16-2021

another was relied upon, which was a case, in which the power of the Consumer Forums under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, was considered and accordingly held that it is abundantly clear that the Tribunals are creatures of the statute … interpretation and keeping in mind that special connotation acquired by the word 'cognizance'. Once that interpretation is accepted, Chapter XXXVI along with the heading has to be understood in that light. The rule of purposive construction can … 59 SASIREKHA KALIKA HOUSE, KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 60 BIJESH B.JOSE KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 61 USHA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2021

Binu Cherian vs Central Pollution Control Board

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-16-2021

another was relied upon, which was a case, in which the power of the Consumer Forums under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, was considered and accordingly held that it is abundantly clear that the Tribunals are creatures of the statute … interpretation and keeping in mind that special connotation acquired by the word 'cognizance'. Once that interpretation is accepted, Chapter XXXVI along with the heading has to be understood in that light. The rule of purposive construction can … 59 SASIREKHA KALIKA HOUSE, KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 60 BIJESH B.JOSE KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 61 USHA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2021

M/S.Western Granites, vs the Director, Mining and Geology Directorate

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-16-2021

another was relied upon, which was a case, in which the power of the Consumer Forums under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, was considered and accordingly held that it is abundantly clear that the Tribunals are creatures of the statute … interpretation and keeping in mind that special connotation acquired by the word 'cognizance'. Once that interpretation is accepted, Chapter XXXVI along with the heading has to be understood in that light. The rule of purposive construction can … 59 SASIREKHA KALIKA HOUSE, KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 60 BIJESH B.JOSE KONNAKKALKADAVU, KORENCHIRA P.O., KIZHAKKENCHERRY, PALAKKAD - 678 684. 61 USHA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial