Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: consumer protection act 1986 chapter 4 · Page 1 of about 494 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 02 2011

Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation Vs. Shrishti Properties Pvt Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-02-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act - Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25-B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 29 Rule 1 read with Order 3 Rule 1

with the provisions of Section 86 of the Code and it applicability to a complaint filed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; in this context the Apex Court had noted that the provisions of Section 86 are excluded and are … the District Forum shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of section 195, and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)."10. The powers of Controller under the DRCA … on the ground floor of the suit premises i.e. premises bearing No. 44, Janpath, New Delhi; area under the possession of the tenant is about

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2013

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2013

Subject : Service Tax

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; (c) dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in sub-section (1) of section 7B of … the order, such of its powers and functions under this Act (except the power to settle dispute under Chapter IV and to make regulation under section36) as it may deem necessary. 35.Power to make rules.- (1) The … Appeal No.2794 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.3504 of 2006 Civil Appeal Nos. 4965-4966 of 2007 Civil Appeal No.177 of 2008 Civil Appeal Nos. 598-599 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2012

J. Subramaniam Advocate and Others Vs. the Manager M/S. Bharati Airtel ...

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2012

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 04 2016

B. Nagaraj Vs. Green Earth Biotechnologies Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-04-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

application to set aside exparte order. This Court clearly held that while dealing with the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13(2) and (4) of the Act and Rules 88 and 89 of the Tamil Nadu, it has … and the Forum shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purpose of Section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 17. When the Consumer Protection Forum has got the power

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2020

M/S Magma Fincorp Ltd. (Formerly Magma Leasing Limited) Vs. Rajesh Kum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-2020

Subject : MRTP

No.5 of 2018, filed by the Appellant [hereinafter referred to as the Financier]., under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against an order dated 31st August, 2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh [herein … the District Forum shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of Section 195, and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974). (6) Where the complainant is a consumer … June, 2005. The Complainant apparently deposited post dated cheques of Rs.12,531/-. 3 4. A part of the recital and some of the relevant terms and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2012

Hall Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-14-2012

Subject : Education

cases, and not separately taxable in Chapter 13 (and now Chapter 12) cases. The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 subsequently amended §346, expressly aligning its assignment of state or local taxes with the IRC separate … is “incurred by the estate” and thus dischargeable. We hold that it is not. I A      In 1986, Congress enacted Chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code, §1201 et seq., to allow farmer debtors with regu- lar … thus is neither collectible nor dischargeable in the Chapter 12 plan. Pp. 4−17.      (a) The phrase “incurred by the estate” bears a plain and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1991

Bharat S/O Maganbhai Kheta Vs. Nagpur Improvement Trust

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-28-1991

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1992)94BOMLR67

Teachers for purpose of granting retrial benefits cannot be said to be unconstitutional or bad in law -- CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 -- Article 16; Right to pension Held, It is true that the pension is neither a bounty nor … divisions based on the various stages of acquisition. A scheme is framed by the Nagpur Improvement Trust under Chapter IV of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act. After the scheme is prepared it has to be published in … of the Constitution, the petitioners challenge notifications issued under Sections 31 and 45 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the NIT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2006

Baldev Singh and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-27-2006

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 2006(3)ShimLC135

a notification dated 27.1.1994 in exercise of the powers vested in it under the provisions of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and the Rules framed thereunder for Environmental Impact Assessment of Development Projects.37. The relevant extracts of the Ministry … follows:Therefore, M/s. Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited should have applied to the State Government for relaxation from observations contained in Chapter 4 and Chapter 5. Since exemption from provision of Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 of the Development Plan of … which means that micro-level details cannot be considered. It is also time consuming and expensive to carry out studies at regional level in a more

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2007

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Davinder Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-12-2007

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 10, 10(2), 12 and 15; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 149

Reported in : 2008ACJ1; AIR2008SC329; 2008(1)ALD(Cri)42; 2008(1)ALLMR(SC)463; 2007(4)AWC3964(SC); 2007(4)KLT954(SC); 2008(1)MhLj497; 2008(3)MPHT236(SC); (2008)149PLR309; RLW2007(4)SC10;

not issued by the Licensing Authority, Solan.4. However, a complaint petition was filed under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum complaining deficiency in service for not paying the amount of damages … the ratio of this decision to a case not involving a third party. The whole protection provided by Chapter XI of the Act is against third party risk. Therefore, in a case where a person is not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2012

Pushpanjali Farm Owners and Residents Association Vs. Ansal Properties ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Sep-11-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial