Advanced Search Results

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

31st March, 2003. The Competition Act has been subsequently amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 and the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009. 114. The Preamble of the Competition Act reads as under:- "An Act to provide, keeping in view of … a patented article or in a licence to manufacture a patented article or to work any patented process. Sub-section (1) of Section 140 of the Patents Act reads as under:- "140 Avoidance of certain restrictive conditions.-(1) It shall

interglobe Aviation Limited Vs the Secretary Competition Commission of ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - sections 11(1), 33(1)(d),66 ; Competition Act, 2002 (`CA'). - sections 26(1),66(1), 66(3), 66(4), 66(5)

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009, stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … writ petitions challenge an order dated 16th June 2010 passed by the Competition Commission of India (`CCI') under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (`CA').2. The background to the present petitions is that by an order

Cross Land Marketing (2000) Pte. Ltd. Vs. the Food Corporation of Indi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2013 Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.8698 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES

G.K. Granites Vs. Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Company Limite

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2013 Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.8698 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES

Apoorva Agencies Vs. Food Corporation of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2013 Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.8698 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES

Vicnivaas Agency Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2013 Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.8698 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES

Vicnivaas Agency Vs. Mmtc Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2013 Date of Decision:21. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.8698 of 2011 G.K. GRANITES

Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana Vs. Gujrat Public Service Commission and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

belonging to any categories mentioned in sub­section (1) gets selected on the basis of merit in an open competition with general candidates, he shall not be adjusted against the vacancies reserved for such category under sub­section (1)." … statutory provisions i.e. Recruitment Rules of 1967, Rules of 2007, 2008 and 2009, we hold that all those candidates belonging to a reserved category, if … select list.8. The learned Single Judge by his order dated 11.06.2015 allowed the application in the following terms:"The action of considering the meritorious reserved category candidates (who secured their position in general/open category on account of their

Namrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

issued and promulgated. On 19th February, 2009 the Ordinance was replaced by the Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) (Amendment) Act, 2009 (U.P. Act No. 3 of 2009). Therefore, said Writ Petition No. 47934 of 2008 was amended challenging the … a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order/notice dated 28th May, 2013 issued by the Director General, Competition Commission of India, New Delhi under Section 41 (2) read with Section 36 (2) of the Competition Act, … 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking issuance of a writ

Anil Khirwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

part of the State Government after coming into force of the Mines and Minerals 2 (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 2015 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘Amendment Act, 2015’) and the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in … [in WPC22072016] Padam Kumar Jain --- --- --- Petitioner [In WPC25152016] Versus 1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Mines and Steel 2. … of allocation of mineral resources. Allocation of mineral resources is now to be held only through auction by competitive bidding. Section 8A (Amended) applies to minerals other than those specified in Part-A and Part-B of the First … Domestic production of Iron ore had fallen from 218 million tonnes in 2009-10 to 152 million tonnes in 2013-14. Section 8A was inserted as the