Advanced Search Results
Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.
Delhi
Oct-10-2019
Land Acquisition
of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … (hereafter ‘CCI’) in Case No.63/2014, whereby CCI had concluded that a case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter ‘the Act’) was established against respondent no.2 (Great Eastern Energy Corporation … to flare up the gas as there was no W.P.(C) 2079/2018 Page 7 of 45 provision to stock CBM. He submitted that these assumptions are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of the Act and … ORS + W.P.(C) 6610/2014 + W.P.(C) 6634/2014, CM APPL. 20409/2014 + W.P.(C) 7087/2014, CM APPL. 16614/2014, CM APPL. 39827/2018 + W.P.(C) 7121/2014, CM APPL. 16680/2014,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCoal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jun-15-2023
Land Acquisition
of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … acts. He would contend that the appellant is a government 8 (1997) 7 SCC33915 company within the meaning of Section 617 of the erstwhile Companies … does not deal with a company like the appellant. In other words, while there may be indication in Section 19(4)(g) of the Act that the fact that a body is a monopoly under the statute may indicate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr
Delhi
Apr-27-2015
MRTP
drawn our attention to Section 37 of the Competition Act which Section prior to its repeal by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 with effect from 12th October, 2007 conferred a power on the CCI to review its order. It was … expressly given by the statute cannot be exercised; (iii) Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Mawasi (2012) 7 SCC200laying down that a power of review is a creature of the statute and no Court or quasi-judicial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2016
MRTP
of provisions came into force on 31st March, 2003. The Competition Act has been subsequently amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 and the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009. 114. The Preamble of the Competition Act reads as under:- "An Act … of judicial scrutiny under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 59. CCI is a body established under Section 7 of the Competition Act and performs the functions as mandated under Chapter IV of the Competition Act. CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSamir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-2020
MRTP
as one does not have to be a “consumer” or a “complainant”, which was the position before the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [“2007 Amendment”].. He contrasted these provisions with sections 53B and 53T of the Act, where the expression used … Information filed on 13.08.2018 [“the Information”]., sought that the Competition Commission of India [“CCI”]. initiate an inquiry, under section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 [“the Act”]., into the alleged anti-competitive conduct of ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. … dominance. This position was amply made clear in Case Nos. 6 & 74 of 2015 and later reiterated in Case Nos. 25, 26, 27 &
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWalmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission
Delhi
Sep-04-2018
Land Acquisition
WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … Committee for an alleged misconduct. The Delhi Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 1995 is also a legislation on point. Section 7 of the Delhi Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 1995 provides for the Lokayukta or Up-Lokayukta to hold inquiry by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCompetition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-09-2010
MRTP
kinds of functions, one, advisory and regulatory and other adjudicatory. Though the Tribunal has been constituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, the Commission continues to perform both the functions stated by 68 this Court in that case. Cumulative effect of … impugned in the present appeal.The informant, i.e. the person who wishes to complain to the Commission constituted under section 7 of the Act, would make such information available in writing to the Commission. Of course, such information could
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...
Delhi
Dec-18-2018
MRTP
as the Commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (g) pass such other 45[order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. 46[Provided that while passing … raised by the appellants before the learned Single Judge with respect to the scope, ambit and applicability of Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2002 were never raised before and / or dealt by the Division Bench … 12th October, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) 7583/2016 and 7578/2016 whereby the learned Single has dismissed the writ petitions by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCompetition Commission of India Vs. Co-Ordination Committee of Artists ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-07-2017
MRTP
the air on some of the fundamental aspects relating to the Act. The Competition Act of 2002, as amended in 2007 and 2009, deals with anti- trust issues, viz. regulation of anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position … raises an interesting and important question of law touching upon the width and scope of jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (for short, the ‘CCI’) under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »