Advanced Search Results

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of the Act and … Section 25 to 27 relating to legal tender and bank notes; Section 45JA - power of RBI to determine policy and issue directions etc.); other

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … the merger is received within 90 days it should be deemed to 45 have been approved. In adjudicating a merger, potential efficiency losses from the … does not deal with a company like the appellant. In other words, while there may be indication in Section 19(4)(g) of the Act that the fact that a body is a monopoly under the statute may indicate

Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … (hereafter ‘CCI’) in Case No.63/2014, whereby CCI had concluded that a case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter ‘the Act’) was established against respondent no.2 (Great Eastern Energy Corporation … (Great Eastern Energy Corporation Ltd. - hereafter W.P.(C) 2079/2018 Page 1 of 45 ‘GEECL’). The petitioner contends that the said decision is ex facie erroneous,

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

as the Commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (g) pass such other 45[order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. 46[Provided that while passing … raised by the appellants before the learned Single Judge with respect to the scope, ambit and applicability of Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2002 were never raised before and / or dealt by the Division Bench

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1991, the Companies Act, 2013, the Company Law Board Regulations, 1991, the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, and the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006. We were informed, that Chartered Accountants were also entitled to appear … |165 ITR166(SC) |no assessable as capital gains. This case law is valid| | | |even after amendment in Section 45(4) which talks of | | | |dissolution or otherwise transferred. | |11 |Manohardas |It is open to the

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

generation, transmission, distribution, trading and use of electricity, (b) taking measures conducive to development of electricity industry, promoting competition therein, 9 protecting interest of consumers and supply of electricity to all areas, (c) rationalization of electricity tariff, … are aggrieved by any of the clauses in the Tariff Order, they are at liberty to seek its amendment or revocation under this provision. Secondly, the said order is also appealable under Section 111 of the 2003 … and Conditions for Determination of Wheeling Tariff and Retail Supply Tariff) Regulations, 2007 (“2007 MYT Regulations”) which are the relevant regulations governing the issues in … are Distribution Licensees (“Discoms”) in terms of Section 2(17) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (‘2003 Act’). The primary function of a Discom is to give … pertaining 75.6485.92 to DVB employees Employee expenses pertaining 45.5051.68 to Non­DVB employees 10% escalation due to Pay

Uttar Pradesh Power Corpn. Limited and Another Vs. Noida Power Corpn. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

it can be altered only in accordance with the prescribed procedure and on grounds available for review or amendment. In the present case, the tariff at the relevant time for the normal supply of 45 MW had … The Judicial Member further finds that NPCL never alleged that the impugned agreement had any adverse effect on competition and that the presumed dominant position of UPPCL had no adverse effect on competition so far as the … Order under section 123 of Electricity Act 2003 The two appeals viz. the appeal Nos. 26/2007 and 36/2007 arise

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

administrative orders or executive instructions without any statutory backing.14. It has been argued before us that formulation or amendment/ modification of a city’s Master Plan is not an administrative but a legislative exercise. Relying on the decisions … and Development Rules has not been followed.56. At this stage, it would also be appropriate to refer to Section 45 of the Delhi Development Act which mandates that where any notice, order or document issued or made under

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

convenience. If the plaintiffs are right about infringement, they are entitled to be protected by their patents against competition by the defendants until those patents expire. They are struggling to establish a new market and to establish … this stage of interim application, while considering the prima facie case and the balance of convenience, the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002), which has come into effect from 20.05.2003 and Amendment Act 2005, which came … P. Jyothimani, J.1. The plaintiff in C.S. No. 979 of 2007 is the defendant in C.S. No. 1111 of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 … of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 of 2007 is a suit filed under Section 108 of the Patents Act, 1970 for the relief of permanent injunction … air fuel mixture in small bore ranging from 45 mm to 70 mm internal combustion engine working

Mso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

impugning the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Second) Tariff (Eighth Amendment) Order 2007 dated 4.10.2007 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (hereinafter referred to … Tariff Order dated 1.10.2004. Their argument is that the Authority has wrongly concluded that there is no effective competition in the broadcasting market and that even though the Authority itself favours forbearance as the best option, the … of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 as amended by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000 defines ' telecommunication service' as follows: “‘telecommunication service’ means service of any description (including electronic mail, voicemail, … (AIR 1994 Supreme Court 2271, at page 2275). 45. The counsel for Appellants in Appeal no. 9 … has been passed without following the requirements of transparency as ordained in section 11 (4) of the TRAI Act. It is also stated that the