Advanced Search Results

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … does not deal with a company like the appellant. In other words, while there may be indication in Section 19(4)(g) of the Act that the fact that a body is a monopoly under the statute may indicate

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of provisions came into force on 31st March, 2003. The Competition Act has been subsequently amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 and the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009. 114. The Preamble of the Competition Act reads as under:- "An Act … of CCI and conduct an investigation into any contravention regarding provisions of the Competition Act. By virtue of Section 42(2) of Competition the Act, the DG has the same powers as conferred upon the CCI under Section 36(2)

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

as the Commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (g) pass such other 45[order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. 46[Provided that while passing … for LPA6372018 and connected matter Page 14 of 42 contravention of orders of the CCI or DG under Section 42 to 44 of the Competition Act and not for contravention of Section 3 and 4 of the Competition

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

administrative orders or executive instructions without any statutory backing.14. It has been argued before us that formulation or amendment/ modification of a city’s Master Plan is not an administrative but a legislative exercise. Relying on the decisions … necessity of complying with the provision in question is avoided, whether the 42 AIR1957SC91243 AIR1917PC142Transfer Case (C) No.229 of 2020 Page 76 of 179 statute … quasi legislative or statutory exercise is mandated by law, has different implications, for example under the Environment Protection Act. This aspect would be considered subsequently.10. In Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Sale … Authority of India and Others,20the dictum in Cynamide India Ltd. was followed. Section 11(4) of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, it was

Federation of Indian Airlines and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 19(1)(g), 162, 14; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Companies Act, 1956; Airports Authority of India Act 1994 - Sections 42, 12A

have been issued by the said authority in the absence of an amendment of the ground handling Regulations 2007 as there is a complete dichotomy … is paramount. It is in the interest of the nation. There is no question of any kind of competition between the commercial interest and the security spectrum. The plea that in the name of security the commercial … 92 of the 1937 Rules to justify the action taken by the authorities. Reliance has been placed on Section 42 of the 1994 Act as the source of power. It is urged that a policy decision has been

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of the Act and … See Columbia Broadcasting System v. United States, 316 U.S. 407, 316 U.S. 421.‖ Hence we refuse to say that the Commission, which had not previously

Gajendra Haldea Vs. State of the Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 9(2), 3(2), 10, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 12(4), 14, 14(2), 14(5), 15, 15(4), 16, 20, 20(9), 23, 24, 25, 26(4), 28, 28(2), 28(3), 29(2), 30 to 34, 42 and 60; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49, 50, 57, 57A and 78A; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 29 and 30; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 42(1), 42(2), 42(3), 61, 82(4), 86(2), 131(2), 185 and 185(2); Comptroller and Auditor General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971; Bulk Supply Tariff Order; Constitution of India - Articles 148 and 226; Delhi Electricity Reform Ordinance; Delhi Electricity Reform (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001

Reported in : 2007(97)DRJ1; 2007LC(DEL)1429

Matched in: Citation 2007(97)DRJ1; 2007LC(DEL)1429

Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commiss ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 5, 12, 22(1), 22B and 22B(1); Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(17), 2(4), 2(70), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12, 12(2), 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 33, 55(2), 55(3), 42, 42(2), 60, 62(1), 62(2), 62(95), 73, 76(1), 81(1), 81(2), 82, 83, 86, 86(1), 125, 128(1), 128(6), 128(7), 128(8), 129 and 181; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1959; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 22(1) and 22; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 43, 43A, 44, 46 and 49; Reforms Act; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Income and Corporation Taxes Act, 1970 - Sections 488; Companies Act - Sections 255 and 256; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); MERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulati

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2966; 2009LC(SC)246; 2009(5)LC2440(SC)

into which is likely to cause or causes an adverse effect on competition in electricity industry; or (b) dominant position has been abused which is … provisions of any contract, agreement or requisition whether made before or after the commencement of the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1959, for the supply (other than the resumption of a supply) or an increase in the Supply of … Session in case No. 87 of 2006 was held on 18th April, 2007 including justification for entering into a long term contract for ten years … and the rules and regulations made thereunder and may, subject to the regulations made under Sub-section (2) of Section 42, supply electricity to any consumer.76. The power to issue directions to the generating companies by the Appropriate Government

Jodhpur City Bus Owners Union Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj517

take a quasi judicial decision and pass orders on the applications submitted by the above referred companies in competition to other operators and, therefore, the Regional Transport Officer could not have been appointed as Member in the … accidents. Admittedly, the buses on the routes opened are running since April, 2007 and almost four months' have passed. No incident has been reported by … these companies are State Transport Undertakings as defined Under Sub-section (42) of Section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 but in fact, they are … received after finalization of the Report of the Review Committee, from the transport operators and public for making amendments in the Act. The draft of the proposals based on the recommendations of the Review Committee and representations

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

a transparent and fair method for making selections so that all eligible persons get a fair opportunity of competition. To put it differently, the State and its agencies/instrumentalities must always adopt a rational method for disposal of … first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2015 (for short the Amendment Act') notified in the extraordinary gazette dated 27.03.2015 and brought into effect on … first, whether the exercise undertaken by Department of Telecommunications (DoT) from September, 2007 to March, 2008 for grant of Unified Access Services (UAS) licences to … 13205, 13206, 13208, 13643 and 15132 of 2015 42. The petitioners in these nine writ petitions apart … two prayers have been made in these petitions, first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and