Advanced Search Results

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … to pass interim orders in Section 33. The CCI can regulate its procedure as provided in Section 36. Section 41 provides for the duty of the Director General. He is to assist the CCI by investigating into any

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

as the Commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (g) pass such other 45[order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. 46[Provided that while passing … and (4) of section 36; or (b) the Director General while exercising powers referred to in sub-section (2)of section 41, such person shall be punishable with fine which may extend to rupees one lakh for each day during

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1991, the Companies Act, 2013, the Company Law Board Regulations, 1991, the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, and the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006. We were informed, that Chartered Accountants were also entitled to appear … at least fifteen years working experience as a Secretary in wholetime practice as defined in clause (45-A) of Section 2 of this Act and is a member of the Institute of the Company Secretaries of India constituted … a going | | |Manufacturing Co.|concern is liable to tax under Section 41(2) on | | |227 ITR260SC) |itemized basis if slump sale is determined

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … The DG thereafter issued notice to the other car manufacturers, on 04.05.2011 under Section 36 (2) read with Section 41(2) of the Act, seeking detailed information and documents from them with reference to an investigation being conducted into

Namrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

impugned order/notice dated 28th May, 2013 issued by the Director General, Competition Commission of India, New Delhi under Section 41 (2) read with Section 36 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the œCompetition Act?), and further … issued and promulgated. On 19th February, 2009 the Ordinance was replaced by the Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) (Amendment) Act, 2009 (U.P. Act No. 3 of 2009). Therefore, said Writ Petition No. 47934 of 2008 was amended challenging … yield any positive result, therefore, it took a decision on 04th June, 2007 to disinvest in the Sugar Corporation and it was resolved that the

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

respect of Section 13 of the Amendment Act. 41. Many statutes, which may deprive a person of … a transparent and fair method for making selections so that all eligible persons get a fair opportunity of competition. To put it differently, the State and its agencies/instrumentalities must always adopt a rational method for disposal of … first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2015 (for short the Amendment Act') notified in the extraordinary gazette dated 27.03.2015 and brought into effect on … first, whether the exercise undertaken by Department of Telecommunications (DoT) from September, 2007 to March, 2008 for grant of Unified Access Services (UAS) licences to … two prayers have been made in these petitions, first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and

itc Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : The U.P. Urban Planning And Development Act 1973 - Sections 41, 12, 7, 14, 30, 6, 19, 9, 18; Transfer of Property Act 1882 - Section 4; Contract Act - Sections 20, 21

tender/auction basis with a reserve rate, so as to secure a higher price/rate on account of the healthy competition among the applicants. The higher revenue would enable NOIDA to subsidize the price of plots for allotment to … done, the State Government could have asked the NOIDA to make the amendments for giving effect to the policy decision dated 22nd May, 2006. The … made a reasoned interim order on 22.5.2007 directing the state government to exercise its power of revision under section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973 (for short `1973 Act') read with section 12 of

Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

in terms of sections 3 & 4. (iv) Section 26 of the 2002 Act, as recast by 2007 amendment, lays down the procedure for a layered inquiry, which is ordinarily initiated on receiving information from any person … DR. ABHISHEK SINGHVI, SENIOR COUNSEL AND SRI. SAJAN POOVAYYA, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. NAVEEN GUDIKOTE S, ADVOCATE) AND:1. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT9H FLOOR, OFFICE BLOCK-1, KIDWAI NAGAR(EAST), NEW DELHI - 110 023. INDIA. … Another purpose in curbing anti-competitive agreements is to ensure 12 245 U.S. 418 (1918) 13 (2017) 8 SCC4733 ‘level playing field’ for all market players

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by

Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

drawn our attention to Section 37 of the Competition Act which Section prior to its repeal by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 with effect from 12th October, 2007 conferred a power on the CCI to review its order. It was … judicial Tribunal cannot review or alter its decision but since the powers exercised by the Central Government under Section 41 of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 are not judicial or quasi judicial in nature but supervisory over the