Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: competition amendment act 2007 section 40 · Page 1 of about 639 results (0.068 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of the Act and … to issue regulations through an adversary W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 40 of 152 proceeding‖. The same definition has been reiterated in Wharton‘s Law

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2022

Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-23-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

in terms of sections 3 & 4. (iv) Section 26 of the 2002 Act, as recast by 2007 amendment, lays down the procedure for a layered inquiry, which is ordinarily initiated on receiving information from any person … DR. ABHISHEK SINGHVI, SENIOR COUNSEL AND SRI. SAJAN POOVAYYA, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. NAVEEN GUDIKOTE S, ADVOCATE) AND:1. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT9H FLOOR, OFFICE BLOCK-1, KIDWAI NAGAR(EAST), NEW DELHI - 110 023. INDIA. … (TFT, computer monitors). Between March 2017 and January 2018, it imported about 4000 ‘boxed’ microprocessors of Intel claiming warranty in five instances for as many

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2018

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 05 2021

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

administrative orders or executive instructions without any statutory backing.14. It has been argued before us that formulation or amendment/ modification of a city’s Master Plan is not an administrative but a legislative exercise. Relying on the decisions … followed (see R (Copeland) v. London Borough of Tower Hamlets (2011) J.P.L. 40 at para 36, 37 citing Smith v. North Derbyshire Primary Care Trust … quasi legislative or statutory exercise is mandated by law, has different implications, for example under the Environment Protection Act. This aspect would be considered subsequently.10. In Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Sale … Authority of India and Others,20the dictum in Cynamide India Ltd. was followed. Section 11(4) of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, it was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 2023

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-15-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … the object of the amendment made in the EPF Act by Act 40 of 1973 was to treat the dues payable by the employer as … does not deal with a company like the appellant. In other words, while there may be indication in Section 19(4)(g) of the Act that the fact that a body is a monopoly under the statute may indicate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2012

institute of Dental Sciences Sehora Vs. University of Jammu and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Nov-16-2012

Subject : Education

letter dated 28th September, 2006 conveyed formal permission to the Trust under Section 10-A (4) of the Dentists (Amendment) Act, 1993 to establish a new Dental College, under name and style of Institute of Dental Sciences with intake … the Principal. The university vide its Communication No. Regn./07/3543 dated 20th March, 2007 asked the Principal of the petitioner-Institute to furnish selection list of students … of Dental Surgery Course in the Institute. However, only 12 of the 40 candidates appearing in the list forwarded, by the Board turned up for … Regulations, the admission by minority and non- minority Educational Institutions is to be made on the basis of Competitive Entrance Examination and that the petitioner- Institution had adopted, a unique method of admission ignoring the Dental Council

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2012

institute of Dental Sciences Sehora Vs. University of Jammu and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Nov-16-2012

Subject : Education

letter dated 28th September, 2006 conveyed formal permission to the Trust under Section 10-A (4) of the Dentists (Amendment) Act, 1993 to establish a new Dental College, under name and style of Institute of Dental Sciences with intake … the Principal. The university vide its Communication No. Regn./07/3543 dated 20th March, 2007 asked the Principal of the petitioner-Institute to furnish selection list of students … of Dental Surgery Course in the Institute. However, only 12 of the 40 candidates appearing in the list forwarded, by the Board turned up for … Regulations, the admission by minority and non- minority Educational Institutions is to be made on the basis of Competitive Entrance Examination and that the petitioner- Institution had adopted, a unique method of admission ignoring the Dental Council

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2015

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-11-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

a transparent and fair method for making selections so that all eligible persons get a fair opportunity of competition. To put it differently, the State and its agencies/instrumentalities must always adopt a rational method for disposal of … first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2015 (for short the Amendment Act') notified in the extraordinary gazette dated 27.03.2015 and brought into effect on … first, whether the exercise undertaken by Department of Telecommunications (DoT) from September, 2007 to March, 2008 for grant of Unified Access Services (UAS) licences to … two prayers have been made in these petitions, first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and … of Kerala 67 L Ed 1047: 262 US 404 (1923) SCC para 6 : AIR para 6.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2012

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Oct-04-2012

Subject : Electricity

generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity are conducted on commercial principles; (c) the factors which would encourage competition, efficiency, economical use of the resources, good performance and optimum investments; (d) safeguarding of consumers’ interest and at … section 39; (l) payment of the transmission charges and a surcharge under sub-clause (ii) of clause (c) of section 40; (m) reduction of surcharge and cross subsidies under second proviso to sub-clause (ii) of clause (c) of section … of sub-section (2) of section 18; (f) publication of the alterations or amendments to be made in the licence under clause (c) of sub-section (2) … a manufacturing facility at Manesar, Haryana. For the purposes of its business activities, Appellant has established a captive power plant having a capacity of 66 … i. It was noted that some time during 2007-08 the Government of Haryana had waived off the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2012

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Oct-04-2012

Subject : Electricity

generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity are conducted on commercial principles; (c) the factors which would encourage competition, efficiency, economical use of the resources, good performance and optimum investments; (d) safeguarding of consumers interest and at … section 39; (l) payment of the transmission charges and a surcharge under sub-clause (ii) of clause (c) of section 40; (m) reduction of surcharge and cross subsidies under second proviso to sub-clause (ii) of clause (c) of section … of sub-section (2) of section 18; (f) publication of the alterations or amendments to be made in the licence under clause (c) of sub-section (2) … a manufacturing facility at Manesar, Haryana. For the purposes of its business activities, Appellant has established a captive power plant having a capacity of 66 … i. It was noted that some time during 2007-08 the Government of Haryana had waived off the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial