Advanced Search Results
Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...
Delhi
Dec-18-2018
MRTP
as the Commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (g) pass such other 45[order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. 46[Provided that while passing … or fails to pay the fine imposed under sub-section (2), he shall, without prejudice to any proceeding under section 39, be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCoal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jun-15-2023
Land Acquisition
of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … does not deal with a company like the appellant. In other words, while there may be indication in Section 19(4)(g) of the Act that the fact that a body is a monopoly under the statute may indicate … important, geared and duty bound to achieve the objects declared in Article 39(b) of the 2 Constitution of India and the second appellant, Western Coalfields
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.
Delhi
Oct-10-2019
Land Acquisition
of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … (hereafter ‘CCI’) in Case No.63/2014, whereby CCI had concluded that a case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter ‘the Act’) was established against respondent no.2 (Great Eastern Energy Corporation … flare the same. This may be for various reasons, W.P.(C) 2079/2018 Page 39 of 45 including mismatch of demand and supply at a given point
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-11-2015
Land Acquisition
a transparent and fair method for making selections so that all eligible persons get a fair opportunity of competition. To put it differently, the State and its agencies/instrumentalities must always adopt a rational method for disposal of … first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2015 (for short the Amendment Act') notified in the extraordinary gazette dated 27.03.2015 and brought into effect on … first, whether the exercise undertaken by Department of Telecommunications (DoT) from September, 2007 to March, 2008 for grant of Unified Access Services (UAS) licences to … and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 39, 300(A) and 301 of the Constitution of India, … two prayers have been made in these petitions, first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … case of imposition of penalty, one mode of recovery is through reference to the concerned income tax authority [Section 39 (2)].; such officer or income tax authority can then recover the penalty as if the party concerned were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIntel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India
Karnataka
Aug-23-2022
Land Acquisition
in terms of sections 3 & 4. (iv) Section 26 of the 2002 Act, as recast by 2007 amendment, lays down the procedure for a layered inquiry, which is ordinarily initiated on receiving information from any person … DR. ABHISHEK SINGHVI, SENIOR COUNSEL AND SRI. SAJAN POOVAYYA, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. NAVEEN GUDIKOTE S, ADVOCATE) AND:1. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT9H FLOOR, OFFICE BLOCK-1, KIDWAI NAGAR(EAST), NEW DELHI - 110 023. INDIA. … directly from the Directive Principles of State Policy in Articles 38 and 39 of the Constitution…Its core chapter on concentration of economic power singled out
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWalmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission
Delhi
Sep-04-2018
Land Acquisition
WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jan-05-2021
Land Acquisition
administrative orders or executive instructions without any statutory backing.14. It has been argued before us that formulation or amendment/ modification of a city’s Master Plan is not an administrative but a legislative exercise. Relying on the decisions … affidavit of the Respondents reads:- “No Change in the Character of Plan 39. it is submitted that change in land use is in the direction … quasi legislative or statutory exercise is mandated by law, has different implications, for example under the Environment Protection Act. This aspect would be considered subsequently.10. In Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Sale … Authority of India and Others,20the dictum in Cynamide India Ltd. was followed. Section 11(4) of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, it was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Jan-15-2009
MRTP
impugning the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Second) Tariff (Eighth Amendment) Order 2007 dated 4.10.2007 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (hereinafter referred to … Tariff Order dated 1.10.2004. Their argument is that the Authority has wrongly concluded that there is no effective competition in the broadcasting market and that even though the Authority itself favours forbearance as the best option, the … of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 as amended by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000 defines ' telecommunication service' as follows: “‘telecommunication service’ means service of any description (including electronic mail, voicemail, … be ‘telecommunication service’ and issued the Notification No. 39 dated 9.1.2004. Simultaneously, by another Order S.O.45 (E) … has been passed without following the requirements of transparency as ordained in section 11 (4) of the TRAI Act. It is also stated that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2016
MRTP
of provisions came into force on 31st March, 2003. The Competition Act has been subsequently amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 and the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009. 114. The Preamble of the Competition Act reads as under:- "An Act … to as the 'impugned order' or 'impugned orders') passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter 'CCI') under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter referred to as 'the Competition Act'). The impugned order dated 12th … that Micromax would have the right to file an application under Order 39, Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereafter 'CPC') and if
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »