Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: competition amendment act 2007 section 38 · Page 1 of about 555 results (0.092 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … previously, Section 37 permitted review; however, the 2007 amendment repealed that provision; it has limited rectification power, under Section 38. In case of imposition of penalty, one mode of recovery is through reference to the concerned income tax

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2008

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

this stage of interim application, while considering the prima facie case and the balance of convenience, the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002), which has come into effect from 20.05.2003 and Amendment Act 2005, which came … convenience. If the plaintiffs are right about infringement, they are entitled to be protected by their patents against competition by the defendants until those patents expire. They are struggling to establish a new market and to establish … P. Jyothimani, J.1. The plaintiff in C.S. No. 979 of 2007 is the defendant in C.S. No. 1111 of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 … of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 of 2007 is a suit filed under Section 108 of the Patents Act, 1970 for the relief of permanent injunction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2018

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … malpractice or misconduct on the part of public servants, from whatever source, would be termed as a complaint.‖ 38. She submitted that in terms of Clause (i) of Paragraph 3.2.1 of the CVC Manual, complaints and allegations

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 29 2012

J. Subramaniam Advocate and Others Vs. the Manager M/S. Bharati Airtel ...

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2012

Subject : MRTP

1933 2. The Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India Act, 1997 3. Information Technology Act 2000 4. Indian Telegraph (Amendment) Act 2003 5. The Telecom Consumers Protection and Redressal of Grievances Regulations, 2007 1. Consumer Protection Act 1986 In … value added telecom services as also making arrangements for protection and promotion of consumer interest and ensuring fair competition, there is a felt need to separate regulatory functions from service providing functions which will be in keeping … “member” means a member of the Authority appointed under sub-Section (23) of Section 3 and includes the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson; “notification” means a notification published

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2021

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

administrative orders or executive instructions without any statutory backing.14. It has been argued before us that formulation or amendment/ modification of a city’s Master Plan is not an administrative but a legislative exercise. Relying on the decisions … ‘principles of natural justice’, when the town planning and development authority wanted 38 (2012) 2 SCC23239 (2015) 10 SCC400Transfer Case (C) No.229 of 2020 Page … quasi legislative or statutory exercise is mandated by law, has different implications, for example under the Environment Protection Act. This aspect would be considered subsequently.10. In Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Sale … Authority of India and Others,20the dictum in Cynamide India Ltd. was followed. Section 11(4) of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, it was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2015

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-11-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

a transparent and fair method for making selections so that all eligible persons get a fair opportunity of competition. To put it differently, the State and its agencies/instrumentalities must always adopt a rational method for disposal of … first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2015 (for short the Amendment Act') notified in the extraordinary gazette dated 27.03.2015 and brought into effect on … first, whether the exercise undertaken by Department of Telecommunications (DoT) from September, 2007 to March, 2008 for grant of Unified Access Services (UAS) licences to … 2 SCC 333)in paragraph-38 Supreme Court observed thus: 38. To the same effect are the observations of … two prayers have been made in these petitions, first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2016

K.R. Khaleel Ahmed and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-21-2016

Subject : Education

Papers in regional language having wide circulation in the State specifying the condition of eligibility, the nature of competition, the provisional number of vacancies to be filled up and the reservations available in favour of Scheduled Castes, … of past discrimination but perpetuating it. 163. It is in this background, the Parliament brought the Constitution (Seventy-Seventh Amendment) Act, 1995; The Constitution (Eighty-First Amendment) Act, 2000; The Constitution (Eighty-Second Amendment) Act, 2000 and the Constitution (Eighty-Fifth Amendment) … Court in the case of S.B.BHATTACHARJEE vs S.D.MAJUMDAR AND OTHERS reported in 2007 (10) SCC 513 dealing with the weight to be attached to the … in conformity with Art.16(4) of the Constitution and also in conformity with Section 4(1) of the Karnataka SC/ST and Other Backward Classes (Reservation on appointments, … submits that in the 1998 selection out of 383 posts for which applications were called for, 187

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2011

In the Matter Of: Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Gujarat Vs. Gujarat ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-31-2011

Subject : Electricity

dated 11.08.2006. 7 On 7.1.2009, the Government of Gujarat amended the Wind Power Policy, 2007. As per this amendment to the Policy the Distribution Licensees were allowed to purchase surplus power from Wind Turbine Generators wheeling power … be implemented is beneficial to the 2nd Respondent. 38. Shri C K Rai, Learned Counsel for the … Obligation set by the State Commission, the purchase of excess energy shall be at the rate determined through competitive bidding. Admittedly there was no competitive bidding process implemented for procurement of such surplus energy by the Appellant. … of the above communication to the 2nd Respondent. 9 Aggrieved by the act of the Appellant, the 2nd Respondent filed petition before the State Commission … 2006 passed by the State Commission while discharging its statutory function under section 62 and 86 of the Electricity Act 2003. II. The generation tariff

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2019

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax law, company law or environment law, etc. LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF TRIBUNALISATION :38. In India, the Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 paved way for tribunalisation of the justice dispensation system by introduction of Articles 323A and 323B in … methods to regulate anti- competitive practices. This Committee recommended establishment of the Competition Commission of India (CCI), which was envisioned to maintain adequate competition in … From Hewart to Leggatt” 28 TRAS51(2009) 6 Excerpts from the ‘Explanatory Notes to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act, 2007’ prepared by the Ministry of Justice, British Parliament. 10 II. Canada 23. The Tribunal system in Canada, although … petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2014

M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Decided on : May-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

No. 11 of 2013. 2. The 1st group consists of Appeal No. 20 of 2011 which relates to Competition Commission of India (in short the 'CCI') Case No. 19 of 2010 in which Belaire Owners Association CBOA0 … deed is executed and only then the ownership of the property gets transferred to the ultimate owner. Finally, amendment to the definition of 'service' in the Finance Act for levying service tax with effect from 01.07.2010 by … Mr. Sanjay Bhasin from whom 85 lakhs were extracted by 16th January 2007, a date on which the ABA was executed. However, he was not … position, considering all the aspects of section 19(4). 38. As regards the abuse of dominance, it was … apartment allottees. These clauses were also not reconcilable with the provisions of section 9 of the Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, 1983 as well. It was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial