Advanced Search Results

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of India and Another

Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by the Central Government. W.P.(C) 3044/2016 Page 19 of 27 28. In terms of Clauses (c) and (d) of Section 8(1) of the CVC Act, it is expressly provided

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition Commission of India & Ors

Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … achieve those objectives, the Board has tariff framing authority : through regulations under Section 22(1). By virtue of Section 28, the PNGRB Board is empowered to entertain complaints or upon its satisfaction upon information, that anyone contravenes provisions

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

convenience. If the plaintiffs are right about infringement, they are entitled to be protected by their patents against competition by the defendants until those patents expire. They are struggling to establish a new market and to establish … this stage of interim application, while considering the prima facie case and the balance of convenience, the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002), which has come into effect from 20.05.2003 and Amendment Act 2005, which came … P. Jyothimani, J.1. The plaintiff in C.S. No. 979 of 2007 is the defendant in C.S. No. 1111 of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 … of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 of 2007 is a suit filed under Section 108 of the Patents Act, 1970 for the relief of permanent injunction … stand cancelled. This order will apply only till 28.01.2000. If for some reason, matter cannot be heard

Krishna Adit Agarwal Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Medical Council of India Act - Sections 10A; The Delhi Professional Colleges OR Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee, Regulation of Admission, Fixation of Non Exploitative Fees and Other Measures to Ensure Equity And Excellence) Act, 2007 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 13, 14, 18, 23 and 23(2); Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Act, 1998 - Sections 6, 6(1), 6(2) and 39; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Constitution (93rd Amendment) Act, 2005; Delhi School Education Act; Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995; The Delhi Professional Colleges or Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee, Regulation of Admission, Fixation of Non-Exploitative Fee and Other Measures to Ensure Equity and Excellence) Rule, 2007 -

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT669

they do not enjoy a level playing field when it comes to competition with their civilian counter parts. Since the education of children of army … Govt. of NCT of Delhi after amendment in Article 15 of the Constitution of India vide Constitution (93rd Amendment) Act, 2005 dated 28.1.2006. In the counter affidavit of the said University dated 17.5.2008, the respondent University stated that … Capitation Fee, Regulation Of Admission, Fixation Of Non Exploitative Fees And Other Measures To Ensure Equity And Excellence) Act, 2007' (referred as to 'Delhi Act 80 of 2007' I may note that whereas in the Gazette Notification, the … of the aforesaid finding is that the respondent institute is governed by the Delhi Act No. 80 of 2007. Section 12 of the Said Act is relevant and the same reads as follows:12. Allocation and reservation of seats-(1)