Advanced Search Results

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … of powers and principles of preserving the independence of the judiciary. It is submitted that the penalty under Section 27 of the Act is vague, discriminatory, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Further,

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005 - Article 15(5); ;Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Sections 2, 2(24), 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 13 and 55; ;Societies Registration Act, 1960; ;Civil Rights Act, 1964; ; Constitution of India (86th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Madras Provincial and Subordinate Services Rule, 1942; Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 5 and 13AA; ;Constitution of India - Articles 3(4), 12 to 35, 38, 38(1), 38(2), 39, 41, 45, 46, 47, 51A, 51A(3), 109, 117, 136, 143(1), 162, 226, 227, 292, 323A2D, 323B3D, 325, 330, 332, 334, 337, 329A(4), 334, 335, 337, 340, 341, 341(1), 342, 358, 359, 366(24), 366(25), 368, 368(2) and 371D(5); Reciprocal Insurance A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534; [2008] 4 SCR 1

other affirmative action contemplated under Article 15(5) of the Constitution of India 164. Based on the Ninety-Third Constitutional Amendment Act, Act 5 of 2007 has been enacted. According to the petitioner's Counsel, this is a 'suspect legislation' and … inequalities. It would enable the advanced castes to eliminate any challenge or competition to their leadership in the professions and services and that they will … equal - That will be a beginning for a casteless egalitarian society - CENTRAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIOs(RESERVATION IN ADMISSION) ACT, 2007. Section 2(g): [K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I., Dr. Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker, R.V. Raveendran & Dalveer Bhandari, JJ] (per Court) - … of Personnel and Training) issued an Office Memorandum dated 08.09.1993 providing for 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes. The Memorandum reads as follows:OFFICE MEMORANDUMSubject :

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition Commission of India & Ors

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of India and Another

Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

an example of such stand, he referred to an Order of the Competition Commission of India dated 27.2.2018, in which he referred to the stand … provision did not include broadcasting services only for the time being. The proviso which was added by the Amendment Act of 2000 made 18 it clear that the time had come to include broadcasting services as well. He … covered by the Copyright Act. He relied heavily upon the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharati) Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the “Sports Act”), by way of contrast, and stated that in this Act the … The scope of the amendments made in the year 2012 along with Section 37 was correctly dealt with. This Court is of the view that

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … Stores Inc.‘s operation in Mexico had found certain evidence of bribery in India. W.P.(C) 3044/2016 Page 1 of 27 2. The principal controversy involved in the present petition is whether the CVC has the jurisdiction to conduct

Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.