Advanced Search Results
Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr
Delhi
Apr-27-2015
MRTP
drawn our attention to Section 37 of the Competition Act which Section prior to its repeal by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 with effect from 12th October, 2007 conferred a power on the CCI to review its order. It was … filed the writ petition impugning, a) the order dated 15th April, 2014 of the respondent No.1 CCI under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act directing investigation by DG, CCI into the Case No.06/2014 filed by the respondent No.2,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCompetition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-09-2010
MRTP
kinds of functions, one, advisory and regulatory and other adjudicatory. Though the Tribunal has been constituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, the Commission continues to perform both the functions stated by 68 this Court in that case. Cumulative effect of … background in mind.Jindal Steel; Powers Ltd. (for short the `informant') invoked the provisions of Section 19 read with Section 26(1) of the Act by providing information to the Commission alleging that M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. (for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.
Delhi
Oct-10-2019
Land Acquisition
of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … had been contravened. It is earnestly contended that CCI was required to direct further inquiry as contemplated under Section 26(8) of the Act and it was not open for CCI to summarily reject the DG report which, after
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … which is extracted below: SECTION OF DETAILS RELEVANT THE ACT Section 35 Regulation 29 Section 36(2) Section 19 Section 26 (2) States that the parties can present the case before CCI Provides arguments by parties before the Tribunal.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCoal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jun-15-2023
Land Acquisition
of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … individual case. Equally, we may only indicate, that, in particular, countervailing buying power would be a relevant factor. Section 26 provides for the procedure 72 for holding the inquiry employing the methods declared in Section 19(4) to find
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIntel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India
Karnataka
Aug-23-2022
Land Acquisition
in terms of sections 3 & 4. (iv) Section 26 of the 2002 Act, as recast by 2007 amendment, lays down the procedure for a layered inquiry, which is ordinarily initiated on receiving information from any person … order dated 09.08.2019 made by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter ‘Commission’) whereby in exercise of powers under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter ‘2002 Act’) an investigation as to whether their warranty policy has (i)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSamir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-2020
MRTP
as one does not have to be a “consumer” or a “complainant”, which was the position before the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [“2007 Amendment”].. He contrasted these provisions with sections 53B and 53T of the Act, where the expression used … Information filed on 13.08.2018 [“the Information”]., sought that the Competition Commission of India [“CCI”]. initiate an inquiry, under section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 [“the Act”]., into the alleged anti-competitive conduct of ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. [“Ola”].,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWalmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission
Delhi
Sep-04-2018
Land Acquisition
WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:04. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 3044/2016 & CM Nos. 12845/2016, 18410/2016 & 26211/2017 WALMART INDIA PVT. LTD. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION Advocates who appeared in this case:
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...
Delhi
Dec-18-2018
MRTP
as the Commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (g) pass such other 45[order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. 46[Provided that while passing … raised by the appellants before the learned Single Judge with respect to the scope, ambit and applicability of Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2002 were never raised before and / or dealt by the Division Bench … Agriculture v M/s Mahyco Monsanto Biotech Ltd (Ref. Case No.02/2015, order dated 26/07/2016) followed the above decision and had further cited Shailendra Swarup v. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore and Another Vs. M/s. Manipal ...
Karnataka
Mar-09-2015
Direct Taxation
194-I are squarely attracted. The CIT and the Tribunal proceeded on a misconception that by virtue of the amendment to clause 2.1(b) of the agreement dated 29.4.2006, the consideration amount paid cannot be construed as rent, ignoring … (Prayer: ITA.no.747/2009 is filed u/s.260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arising out of order dated 03-07-2009 passed in ITA No.699/BNG/2008, for the assessment year 2006-2007, praying to … Justice and equity.) S. Sujatha, J. 1. Revenue is in appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as âthe … and equity.) S. Sujatha, J. 1. Revenue is in appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as âthe Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »