Advanced Search Results

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … as practicable, be given an opportunity to express its views before any direction is given under this sub- section. (2) The decision of the Central Government whether a question is one of policy or not shall be final.

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005 - Article 15(5); ;Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Sections 2, 2(24), 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 13 and 55; ;Societies Registration Act, 1960; ;Civil Rights Act, 1964; ; Constitution of India (86th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Madras Provincial and Subordinate Services Rule, 1942; Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 5 and 13AA; ;Constitution of India - Articles 3(4), 12 to 35, 38, 38(1), 38(2), 39, 41, 45, 46, 47, 51A, 51A(3), 109, 117, 136, 143(1), 162, 226, 227, 292, 323A2D, 323B3D, 325, 330, 332, 334, 337, 329A(4), 334, 335, 337, 340, 341, 341(1), 342, 358, 359, 366(24), 366(25), 368, 368(2) and 371D(5); Reciprocal Insurance A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534; [2008] 4 SCR 1

other affirmative action contemplated under Article 15(5) of the Constitution of India 164. Based on the Ninety-Third Constitutional Amendment Act, Act 5 of 2007 has been enacted. According to the petitioner's Counsel, this is a 'suspect legislation' and … inequalities. It would enable the advanced castes to eliminate any challenge or competition to their leadership in the professions and services and that they will … equal - That will be a beginning for a casteless egalitarian society - CENTRAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIOs(RESERVATION IN ADMISSION) ACT, 2007. Section 2(g): [K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I., Dr. Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker, R.V. Raveendran & Dalveer Bhandari, JJ] (per Court) -

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2845 of 2017 COAL INDIA LIMITED AND ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND … does not deal with a company like the appellant. In other words, while there may be indication in Section 19(4)(g) of the Act that the fact that a body is a monopoly under the statute may indicate

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of provisions came into force on 31st March, 2003. The Competition Act has been subsequently amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 and the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009. 114. The Preamble of the Competition Act reads as under:- "An Act … a patentee insofar as grant of patent license is concerned, is not an 'enterprise' within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the Act. (b) That the patentee insofar as licensing of patent is concerned, is not engaged in

Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

drawn our attention to Section 37 of the Competition Act which Section prior to its repeal by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 with effect from 12th October, 2007 conferred a power on the CCI to review its order. It was … *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h April, 2015 % + LPA No.733/2014 GOOGLE INC. & ORS. Through: .….. Appellants Mr. Gopal Subramaniam and Mr. Ramji Srinivasan,

Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

in terms of sections 3 & 4. (iv) Section 26 of the 2002 Act, as recast by 2007 amendment, lays down the procedure for a layered inquiry, which is ordinarily initiated on receiving information from any person … DR. ABHISHEK SINGHVI, SENIOR COUNSEL AND SRI. SAJAN POOVAYYA, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. NAVEEN GUDIKOTE S, ADVOCATE) AND:1. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT9H FLOOR, OFFICE BLOCK-1, KIDWAI NAGAR(EAST), NEW DELHI - 110 023. INDIA. … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF AUGUST, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.50727 OF2019GM-RES) BETWEEN:1.

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

an example of such stand, he referred to an Order of the Competition Commission of India dated 27.2.2018, in which he referred to the stand … provision did not include broadcasting services only for the time being. The proviso which was added by the Amendment Act of 2000 made 18 it clear that the time had come to include broadcasting services as well. He … covered by the Copyright Act. He relied heavily upon the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharati) Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the “Sports Act”), by way of contrast, and stated that in this Act the … of rates of pay channels. According to the learned Senior Advocate, the definition of “telecommunication service” contained in Section 2(1)(k) of the TRAI Act only enables TRAI to regulate transmission or reception of broadcasting services, which essentially relates

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:04. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 3044/2016 & CM Nos. 12845/2016, 18410/2016 & 26211/2017 WALMART INDIA PVT. LTD. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION Advocates who appeared in this case:

Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

as one does not have to be a “consumer” or a “complainant”, which was the position before the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [“2007 Amendment”].. He contrasted these provisions with sections 53B and 53T of the Act, where the expression used … this section,- (a) “chartered accountant” means a chartered accountant as defined in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949) and who has obtained a certificate of practice under

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Private Ltd & Anr. Vs.competition ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

as the Commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (g) pass such other 45[order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. 46[Provided that while passing … raised by the appellants before the learned Single Judge with respect to the scope, ambit and applicability of Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2002 were never raised before and / or dealt by the Division Bench … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 19, 2018 Judgment delivered on: December 18, 2018 + LPA6372018 & CM. Nos. 47926/2018