Advanced Search Results

Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

kinds of functions, one, advisory and regulatory and other adjudicatory. Though the Tribunal has been constituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, the Commission continues to perform both the functions stated by 68 this Court in that case. Cumulative effect of … should be impleaded as a party and be heard in accordance with law. Emphasis was also placed on Section 18 of the Act to contend that powers, functions and duties of the Commission were such that it would

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … instrumentalities are commonly informants or opposite parties in proceedings before the CCI. The Ld. Senior Counsel argues that Section 18 of the Act shows that the regulatory and adjudicatory functions are discharged by adjudicatory function under Section 3

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … in the discharge of its functions under this Act.64. The duties of the CCI are spelt out in Section 18. It reads as follows: “18. Subject to the provisions of this Act, it shall be the duty of

Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

as one does not have to be a “consumer” or a “complainant”, which was the position before the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [“2007 Amendment”].. He contrasted these provisions with sections 53B and 53T of the Act, where the expression used … Information filed on 13.08.2018 [“the Information”]., sought that the Competition Commission of India [“CCI”]. initiate an inquiry, under section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 [“the Act”]., into the alleged anti-competitive conduct of ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. … 4 employed to orchestrate price-fixing cartel amongst the drivers… xxx xxx xxx 18. Based on the foregoing discussion, the allegations raised by the Informant with

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:04. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 3044/2016 & CM Nos. 12845/2016, 18410/2016 & 26211/2017 WALMART INDIA PVT. LTD. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION Advocates who appeared in

B.K. Bhaskar and ors. Vs. the Commissioner, Bangalore Development Auth ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 2(1), 5, 6, 18, 18A, 18(A2) and 25; Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2000; Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement (Amendment Ordinance), 2006

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1483; 2009(5)KarLJ337; 2009(2)KCCR1427; 2009(5)AIRKarR36; AIR2009NOC2682;

procurement and the much required transparency in the procurement process, processes like reverse auction saving due to increased competition. In order to achieve the said object, it was necessary to create an e-procurement platform that would enable … down in the Act and the Rules made thereunder. Though, by an amendment of the Act, Chapter II-A has been inserted providing for E-Procurement, in … the point that arise for consideration is:In the absence of a Notification being issued by the Government under Section 18(A2) of the Act, is it permissible for the Bangalore Development Authority to adopt e-procurement for procuring goods and

Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … (hereafter ‘CCI’) in Case No.63/2014, whereby CCI had concluded that a case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter ‘the Act’) was established against respondent no.2 (Great Eastern Energy Corporation … to accept the aforesaid contention, inter alia, for the W.P.(C) 2079/2018 Page 18 of 45 reason that it presumes that the finding whether an unfair

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

schemes is the same that is to relieve the duties paid on the exported goods to make these competitive in International market to earn foreign exchange. As per Rule 18, the duty paid on goods exported and … date CVD was specified as one of the duties entitled to rebate. It is submitted that the aforesaid amendment is not retrospective or clarificatory in nature and is accordingly prospective and would apply with effect from 1st … 21/2004 was amended subsequently by notification No. 12/2007 effective from 1st March, 2007 and with effect from the said date CVD was specified as one … by the Government of India under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944(Act, for short). The said orders are authored by Joint Secretary to

Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

in terms of sections 3 & 4. (iv) Section 26 of the 2002 Act, as recast by 2007 amendment, lays down the procedure for a layered inquiry, which is ordinarily initiated on receiving information from any person … DR. ABHISHEK SINGHVI, SENIOR COUNSEL AND SRI. SAJAN POOVAYYA, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. NAVEEN GUDIKOTE S, ADVOCATE) AND:1. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT9H FLOOR, OFFICE BLOCK-1, KIDWAI NAGAR(EAST), NEW DELHI - 110 023. INDIA. … Woodroffe & Ameer Ali, ‘Law of Evidence’, 21st Edition, Volume 2, pp 1807 - 1809 (2021) 15 G.M. ARUMUGAM vs. S. RAJGOPAL AIR1976SC93934 Therefore, it

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1991, the Companies Act, 2013, the Company Law Board Regulations, 1991, the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, and the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006. We were informed, that Chartered Accountants were also entitled to appear … was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal. (iii) The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 Section 18. Appeal to Supreme Court - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of