Advanced Search Results

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005 - Article 15(5); ;Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Sections 2, 2(24), 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 13 and 55; ;Societies Registration Act, 1960; ;Civil Rights Act, 1964; ; Constitution of India (86th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Madras Provincial and Subordinate Services Rule, 1942; Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 5 and 13AA; ;Constitution of India - Articles 3(4), 12 to 35, 38, 38(1), 38(2), 39, 41, 45, 46, 47, 51A, 51A(3), 109, 117, 136, 143(1), 162, 226, 227, 292, 323A2D, 323B3D, 325, 330, 332, 334, 337, 329A(4), 334, 335, 337, 340, 341, 341(1), 342, 358, 359, 366(24), 366(25), 368, 368(2) and 371D(5); Reciprocal Insurance A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534; [2008] 4 SCR 1

other affirmative action contemplated under Article 15(5) of the Constitution of India 164. Based on the Ninety-Third Constitutional Amendment Act, Act 5 of 2007 has been enacted. According to the petitioner's Counsel, this is a 'suspect legislation' and … inequalities. It would enable the advanced castes to eliminate any challenge or competition to their leadership in the professions and services and that they will … equal - That will be a beginning for a casteless egalitarian society - CENTRAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIOs(RESERVATION IN ADMISSION) ACT, 2007. Section 2(g): [K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I., Dr. Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker, R.V. Raveendran & Dalveer Bhandari, JJ] (per Court) - … G.E. Vahanvati, pointed out that for the purpose of reservation under Article 16(4) of the Constitution, the Central List has been in operation for the

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of provisions came into force on 31st March, 2003. The Competition Act has been subsequently amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 and the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009. 114. The Preamble of the Competition Act reads as under:- "An Act … Section 7 of the Competition Act provides for establishment of CCI and Section 8 provides for its composition. Section 16 of the Competition Act provides for appointment of Director General for the purposes of assisting CCI and Section

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … being conducted by the Central Vigilance Commission (hereafter ‗CVC‘) in terms of summons dated 29.10.2015 and letters dated 16.11.2015 and 29.03.2016 be set aside. The CVC had initiated an inquiry on the basis of a news report

Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

as one does not have to be a “consumer” or a “complainant”, which was the position before the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [“2007 Amendment”].. He contrasted these provisions with sections 53B and 53T of the Act, where the expression used … Information filed on 13.08.2018 [“the Information”]., sought that the Competition Commission of India [“CCI”]. initiate an inquiry, under section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 [“the Act”]., into the alleged anti-competitive conduct of ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. … section 2 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 16 1959) and who has obtained a certificate of practice under sub- section

Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … (hereafter ‘CCI’) in Case No.63/2014, whereby CCI had concluded that a case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter ‘the Act’) was established against respondent no.2 (Great Eastern Energy Corporation … J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 16.02.2017 passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter ‘CCI’) in Case No.63/2014,

Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

drawn our attention to Section 37 of the Competition Act which Section prior to its repeal by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 with effect from 12th October, 2007 conferred a power on the CCI to review its order. It was … possible that the CCI may finally reject the report of the DG, CCI. (ZK) The DG, CCI under Section 16 of the Competition Act, is only investigative arm of the CCI with the decision, whether there is any

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1991, the Companies Act, 2013, the Company Law Board Regulations, 1991, the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, and the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006. We were informed, that Chartered Accountants were also entitled to appear … at least fifteen years working experience as a Secretary in wholetime practice as defined in clause (45-A) of Section 2 of this Act and is a member of the Institute of the Company Secretaries of India constituted … v. Union of India, (1993) 4 SCC119 this Court observed: (SCC pp. 169-70, para67) “67. The tribunals set up under Articles 323-A and 323-B of

Sauranshu Sinha and Others Vs. Union of India, Through Its Secretary a ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

filing MA 1674/2011 which was heard on 20.7.2011 when the applicants were directed to move an Application for amendment of the Original Application (in short ‘OA). 6. Further during the pendency of the OA, a number of … has been submitted by Shri Sinha that OA was filed initially in 2007. After four years, the OA was sought to be amended by bringing … The applicants in all these Applications belong to the cadre of Assistants who qualified the Combined Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (for short ‘CLDCE) held in different years for promotion to the posts of Section Officer. 2. In … at Annexure A4. The grievance of the applicants has been that this action of respondent no.1 has directly affected the prospects and service conditions of … was challenged by the applicants by filing MA 1674/2011 which was heard on 20.7.2011 when the applicants

Uttar Pradesh Power Corpn. Limited and Another Vs. Noida Power Corpn. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

The Judicial Member further finds that NPCL never alleged that the impugned agreement had any adverse effect on competition and that the presumed dominant position of UPPCL had no adverse effect on competition so far as the … accordance with the prescribed procedure and on grounds available for review or amendment. In the present case, the tariff at the relevant time for the … out of the same impugned order viz the one dated 08 Feb. 2007 passed on a petition filed by the Noida Power Company Ltd (NPCL … grounds: i) The agreement dated 08.05.2006 was obtained by UPPCL from NPCL by undue influence as defined under Section 16 of the Contract Act and did not amount to a contract under Section 10. ii) The claim of

In the Matter Of: Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Gujarat Vs. Gujarat ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

dated 11.08.2006. 7 On 7.1.2009, the Government of Gujarat amended the Wind Power Policy, 2007. As per this amendment to the Policy the Distribution Licensees were allowed to purchase surplus power from Wind Turbine Generators wheeling power … Obligation. 19. Appellant’s main contention is that clause 16 of State Commission’s Order dated 11.08.2006 elucidates that … Obligation set by the State Commission, the purchase of excess energy shall be at the rate determined through competitive bidding. Admittedly there was no competitive bidding process implemented for procurement of such surplus energy by the Appellant. … of the above communication to the 2nd Respondent. 9 Aggrieved by the act of the Appellant, the 2nd Respondent filed petition before the State Commission … 2006 passed by the State Commission while discharging its statutory function under section 62 and 86 of the Electricity Act 2003. II. The generation tariff