Advanced Search Results

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005 - Article 15(5); ;Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Sections 2, 2(24), 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 13 and 55; ;Societies Registration Act, 1960; ;Civil Rights Act, 1964; ; Constitution of India (86th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Madras Provincial and Subordinate Services Rule, 1942; Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 5 and 13AA; ;Constitution of India - Articles 3(4), 12 to 35, 38, 38(1), 38(2), 39, 41, 45, 46, 47, 51A, 51A(3), 109, 117, 136, 143(1), 162, 226, 227, 292, 323A2D, 323B3D, 325, 330, 332, 334, 337, 329A(4), 334, 335, 337, 340, 341, 341(1), 342, 358, 359, 366(24), 366(25), 368, 368(2) and 371D(5); Reciprocal Insurance A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534; [2008] 4 SCR 1

other affirmative action contemplated under Article 15(5) of the Constitution of India 164. Based on the Ninety-Third Constitutional Amendment Act, Act 5 of 2007 has been enacted. According to the petitioner's Counsel, this is a 'suspect legislation' and … inequalities. It would enable the advanced castes to eliminate any challenge or competition to their leadership in the professions and services and that they will … equal - That will be a beginning for a casteless egalitarian society - CENTRAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIOs(RESERVATION IN ADMISSION) ACT, 2007. Section 2(g): [K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I., Dr. Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker, R.V. Raveendran & Dalveer Bhandari, JJ] (per Court) -

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … WIPL also sought further time to identify the relevant information and correspondence. Thereafter, WIPL forwarded a letter dated 15.12.2015 indicating that the management had made representations to the auditors on the basis of which the audited financial

Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

as one does not have to be a “consumer” or a “complainant”, which was the position before the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [“2007 Amendment”].. He contrasted these provisions with sections 53B and 53T of the Act, where the expression used … Information filed on 13.08.2018 [“the Information”]., sought that the Competition Commission of India [“CCI”]. initiate an inquiry, under section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 [“the Act”]., into the alleged anti-competitive conduct of ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. … fix prices which the drivers are bound to accept. xxx xxx xxx 15. In the conventional sense, hub and spoke arrangement refers to exchange of

Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … (hereafter ‘CCI’) in Case No.63/2014, whereby CCI had concluded that a case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter ‘the Act’) was established against respondent no.2 (Great Eastern Energy Corporation … Clause 4.4, Clause 5.2, Clause 6.1, Clause 9.2, Clause 11.2 and Clause 15 of the GSPA were in contravention of Section 4(1) of the Act

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1991, the Companies Act, 2013, the Company Law Board Regulations, 1991, the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, and the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006. We were informed, that Chartered Accountants were also entitled to appear … shall be construed as including a reference to the Appellate Tribunal; (b) the reference to Advocate General in Section 15 of the said Act shall be construed as a reference to such law officers as the Central Government

In the Matter Of: Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Gujarat Vs. Gujarat ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

dated 11.08.2006. 7 On 7.1.2009, the Government of Gujarat amended the Wind Power Policy, 2007. As per this amendment to the Policy the Distribution Licensees were allowed to purchase surplus power from Wind Turbine Generators wheeling power … 2nd Respondent the amount deducted by Appellant @ 15% from the tariff rate determined by the Commission … Obligation set by the State Commission, the purchase of excess energy shall be at the rate determined through competitive bidding. Admittedly there was no competitive bidding process implemented for procurement of such surplus energy by the Appellant. … of the above communication to the 2nd Respondent. 9 Aggrieved by the act of the Appellant, the 2nd Respondent filed petition before the State Commission … 2006 passed by the State Commission while discharging its statutory function under section 62 and 86 of the Electricity Act 2003. II. The generation tariff

Trm Copy Centres (Uk) and Others (Respondents) Vs. Lanwall Services Li ...

Court : House of Lords

Subject : MRTP

that the Location Agreements were not consumer hire agreements within the meaning of section 15 of the 1974 Act: [2007] EWHC 1738 (QB). He decided the other two preliminary issues, as to whether on their true construction the … the retailer. The respondents (for convenience I shall refer to them collectively as “TRM”) carry on business in competition with Lanwall. They too deal in photocopiers, but they do so in a way that differs from the … of section 15 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. That section, as amended, provides: “(1) A consumer hire agreement is an agreement made by a

Mso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

impugning the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Second) Tariff (Eighth Amendment) Order 2007 dated 4.10.2007 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (hereinafter referred to … is that the Authority has wrongly concluded that there is no effective competition in the broadcasting market and that even though the Authority itself favours … of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 as amended by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000 defines ' telecommunication service' as follows: “‘telecommunication service’ means service of any description (including electronic mail, voicemail, … to any matter in which the Appellate Tribunal is empowered by or under the Act, as contained in Section 15, we have no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that the power of the Appellate Tribunal is quite

Zee Turner Ltd. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Others

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

aforesaid interim arrangement was continuing, on or about 03.09.2007, TRAI, made an amendment to the Regulations being Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnect (Fourth Amendment) … as much as having regard to the provisions of the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing of Prasar Bharti) Act, 2007, no exclusivity can be maintained as the contents of a sports channel is required to be shared with … relation to any matter which the appellate tribunal is empowered by or under the Act, as contained in Section 15, we have no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that the power of Appellate Tribunal is quite wide, … its price. Therefore, in view of the fact that there are tough competitions prevailing in this sector, TRAI ought to have opined that the doctrine

Cellular Operators Association of India and Others Versus Union of Ind ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Service Tax

this Tribunal to settle any dispute between the licensor and licensee. There is no limitation in this regard. Section 15 of the TRAI Act bars the jurisdiction of civil courts. The writ petition no. 9654 of 2007 was … been filed with mala fide intentions of perpetuating the Petitioners’ monopoly, preventing competition and is unfairly questioning the policy decision of the Government which has … furnish their recommendations in terms of clause 11 (1) (a) of TRAI Act 1997 as amended by TRAI Amendment Act 2000, on the issue of limiting the number of Access providers in each service area and review of