Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: competition amendment act 2007 section 11 · Page 1 of about 1,411 results (0.109 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 15 2023

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-15-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher. (c) Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … and references therein to the “Central Government” shall be construed as references to the Government company.” 35 36. Section 11 is significant for the purpose of the case. It read: “11. Management, etc., of coal mines.-(1) The general

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2009

Mso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Jan-15-2009

Subject : MRTP

impugning the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Second) Tariff (Eighth Amendment) Order 2007 dated 4.10.2007 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (hereinafter referred to … is that the Authority has wrongly concluded that there is no effective competition in the broadcasting market and that even though the Authority itself favours … of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 as amended by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000 defines ' telecommunication service' as follows: “‘telecommunication service’ means service of any description (including electronic mail, voicemail, … They allege that the impugned Order has been passed without following the requirements of transparency as ordained in section 11 (4) of the TRAI Act. It is also stated that the provisions of the impugned Order are at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

one advisory and regulatory, and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. The Competition Amendment Act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of Braham Dutt (supra). The adjudicatory function of the CCI remained unchanged, … certain cases while also discharging adjudicatory functions. The learned counsel dealt with the provisions of the SEBI Act (Section 11 delineating the regulatory functions of SEBI; Section 15A to 15JA empowering adjudication and levy of penalties, etc.); the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 11 2015

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-11-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2015 (for short the Amendment Act') notified in the extraordinary gazette dated 27.03.2015 and brought into effect on … SCC 516), in particular; and (ii) whether the petitioners have vested right in obtaining prospecting licence-cum-mining lease under Section 11 of the Principal Act, even after its substitution by Section 11 of the Amendment Act? 7. We have … making selections so that all eligible persons get a fair opportunity of competition. To put it differently, the State and its agencies/instrumentalities must always adopt … first, whether the exercise undertaken by Department of Telecommunications (DoT) from September, 2007 to March, 2008 for grant of Unified Access Services (UAS) licences to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2022

Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-23-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

in terms of sections 3 & 4. (iv) Section 26 of the 2002 Act, as recast by 2007 amendment, lays down the procedure for a layered inquiry, which is ordinarily initiated on receiving information from any person … DR. ABHISHEK SINGHVI, SENIOR COUNSEL AND SRI. SAJAN POOVAYYA, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. NAVEEN GUDIKOTE S, ADVOCATE) AND:1. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT9H FLOOR, OFFICE BLOCK-1, KIDWAI NAGAR(EAST), NEW DELHI - 110 023. INDIA. … HAVING ITS OFFICE AT9H FLOOR, OFFICE BLOCK-1, KIDWAI NAGAR(EAST), NEW DELHI - 110 023. INDIA. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 22. MATRIC INFO SYSTEMS PVT LTD.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2018

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

WIPL had also referred to Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002, which was subsequently amended by the Competition Amendment Act, 2007. The provision, as originally enacted, provided for an inquiry ―on receipt of a complaint‖. This was amended by … in the context of which summons had been issued, the CVC clarified that the summons were issued under Section 11 of the CVC Act. The representatives of WIPL appeared before the CVC on 23.11.2015 and submitted a letter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2020

Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2020

Subject : MRTP

as one does not have to be a “consumer” or a “complainant”, which was the position before the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [“2007 Amendment”].. He contrasted these provisions with sections 53B and 53T of the Act, where the expression used … Information filed on 13.08.2018 [“the Information”]., sought that the Competition Commission of India [“CCI”]. initiate an inquiry, under section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 [“the Act”]., into the alleged anti-competitive conduct of ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. … to take rides with those drivers who offer the most competitive fares. 119.Shri Rajshekhar Rao, learned advocate appearing on behalf of Ola, also supported Dr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2019

Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-10-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [Omitted by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be … (hereafter ‘CCI’) in Case No.63/2014, whereby CCI had concluded that a case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter ‘the Act’) was established against respondent no.2 (Great Eastern Energy Corporation … the sole supplier of CBM in the region until 2011- 2012.6. On 11.05.2011, GEECL entered into a Gas Sale Purchase Agreement (hereafter ‘GSPA’) with SRMB.7.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2009

Gadigi Mineral Mining Co., a Private Ltd. Company Incorporated Under t ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-28-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(5), 17(2), 17(4) and 17A; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 7A(1), 7D(2), 15(1), 21(2), 31(1), 35, 40(2), 58, 59, 59(1), 59(2) and 60; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227

Section 11 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter called 'the MMDR Act') by Amendment Act No. 38 of 1999, had made applications for grant of mining lease in respect of the lands, which … Bench in its order dated 12.3.2009 in Writ Appeal No. 807 of 2007 etc., further held that in view of the proviso to Sub-section (2) … it is open to the State to issue notifications so that opportunity would be available to all to competitively apply for grant of mining lease and there shall also be transparency and equal opportunity for the mining

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2013

GeomIn Minerals and Marketing (P) Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Orissa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-10-2013

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act (MM(D&R)), 1957 - Section 11(2), 11(4), 11(3), 11(5); Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 59(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

for short) and Mining Licence (‘ML’ for short), on 20th December, 1999 amendments carried out in Section 11 of MM(D&R;) Act became effective. By the … to take a fresh decision in terms of order dated 27th September, 2007 passed by the Revisional Authority in Revision Application File No.22 (41)/2007-RC-1 by … M/s POSCO’s operating profit margin is the top in the World Steel Industry, and it is the most competitive steel maker as per 2010 World Steel Dynamics. According to 2010 World Economic Forum M/s POSCO is one … The Division Bench further observed that in the event the State Government decides to invoke the provisions of Section 11(5) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the “MM(D&R;) Act”) ,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial