Advanced Search Results
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2016
MRTP
the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … such combinations to be void. 117. Section 7 of the Competition Act provides for establishment of CCI and Section 8 provides for its composition. Section 16 of the Competition Act provides for appointment of Director General for the … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under:
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others
Delhi
Feb-23-2012
MRTP
entertain the complaint on the basis of the information of respondent No. 2 under Section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act). The Commission has rejected the stand of the petitioner that it is not an ‘enterprise’ within … consequently, the proceedings before the Commission could not proceed and were liable to be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This objection too has been rejected by the Commission. 2. Respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarnataka Film Chamber of Commerce, Bangalore Vs. Kannada Grahakara Ko ...
Karnataka
Nov-20-2014
MRTP
The 8th Respondent By Holding That There Is A Prima Faice Case Against The Petitioner For Violating The Competition Act, 2002.) 1. The subject matter of challenge in this petition is a direction dated 18.10.2012 issued under S.26(1) of … that the respondent Nos.1 and 2 having approached the respondent No.8 - the Competition Commission of India, under Section 19(1) of the Act, to institute an enquiry against the petitioner and the respondent Nos.3 to 7, by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … validity of the relevant provisions of the Act with particular reference to Rule 3 of the Rules and Section 8 (2) of the Act, after the enactment is amended as sought to be held out by the Union
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...
Chennai
Mar-29-2016
MRTP
respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … that the coram of the members of the Commission requires a Judicial member, such plea is incorrect, as Section 8 of the Act does not mandate the presence of the Judicial member in the meetings of the Commission.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNamrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...
Allahabad
Dec-04-2013
Land Acquisition
General, Competition Commission of India, New Delhi under Section 41 (2) read with Section 36 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the œCompetition Act?), and further a direction has been sought for upon the Competition Commission of … said Writ Petition No. 47934 of 2008 was amended challenging the vires of the said Amendment Act, 2009. 8. Vide U.P. Act No. 3 of 2009 new sections, being Sections 3-A, 3-B, 3- C, 3-D and 3-E,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWalmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission
Delhi
Sep-04-2018
Land Acquisition
any W.P.(C) 3044/2016 Page 7 of 27 information, and as an illustration, reference to Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 was made. The learned Senior Counsel also referred to Section 21(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which … controversy involved in the present petition is whether the CVC has the jurisdiction to conduct an inquiry under Section 8 of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 (hereafter ‗the CVC Act‘) on the basis of a newspaper report,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskReserve Bank of India Vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry
Supreme Court of India
Dec-16-2015
Right to Information
the enumeration of exemptions attempted in the earlier Act, that is, Section 8 of the Freedom to Information Act, 2002. The courts and Information Commissions enforcing the provisions of the RTI Act have to adopt a purposive construction, … fact that information sought by the appellant is sensitive and cannot be disclosed, it could also harm the competitive position of the co-operative bank. Therefore, exemption from disclosure of the Information is available under Section 8(1)(d) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhat Agri Biotech Ltd. And Anr. Vs.registrar of Plant Varieties and ...
Delhi
Dec-02-2016
Education
it affects its business. The only enactment which uses the term “abusive” is Section 4 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002, which employs it while defining what constitutes “abuse of dominant position” by a business or corporate entity, taking … Varieties and Farmers‟ Rights Authority and Registry is established under Section 3; its general functions are outlined in Section 8. Section 11 enacts as follows: “11. Power of Authority.-In all proceedings under this Act before the Authority or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Gupta Vs. M/S. Paper Merchants Association and Others
Competition Commission of India CCI
Jan-10-2013
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »