Advanced Search Results

M/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

for obtaining its opinion, as per Section 21 of the Competitoin Act, 2002. It had been stated that Section 62 of the Competition Act, 2002, makes it clear that the provisions of the said Act shall be in … cannot render the Final Findings, without referring the matter to the Competition Commission, under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be held to be valid in the eye of law. The issuance of the Disclosure Statement, by

Ramakant Kini Vs. Hiranandani Hospital

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Vijay Gupta Vs. M/S. Paper Merchants Association and Others

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

India (CCI), which was envisioned to maintain adequate competition in the market and protect consumer welfare. Further, the Competition Act, 2002 was later enacted which provided certain powers of Civil Courts to the CCI for effective enquiry and adjudication.37. … selected as Member of the ITAT will continue till the age of 62 years and the person holding the post of President, shall continue till … the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act,

Colgate-palmolive (India) Limited Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCivil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1987; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 36A, 36(1) and 55; Lanham Act; Federal Trade Commission Act - Sections 5(1), 12, 15 and 15(1); Broadcasting Act, 1981; Cable Broadcasting Act, 1984; European Communities Act; Young Persons (Harmful Publications) Act, 1956; Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use)Act, 1950; Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986; Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994; Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Prize Competition Act, 1955; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978; Cigarettes and other Tobacco Product

Reported in : (2008)7MLJ1119; 2009(40)PTC653(Mad)

unfair trade practice.55. However, The MRTP Act, 1969 is sought to be repealed by Section 66 of The Competition Act, 2002 ( Section 66 does not appear to have been notified so far). But fortunately, the power to enquire … practice adopted by a trader or service provider after the enactments of Amendment Acts 50 of 1993 and 62 of 2002. Section 13(3B) inserted under Amendment Act 62 of 2002 with effect from 15-3-2003, enables the Consumer

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … tender in question was noticed by the Director General.12) It was further pointed out that there were only 62 qualified tenderers in the whole country, out of whom 12 bidders were classified as new parties, meaning thereby

Jindal Steel and Power Limited Vs. Chhattisgarh State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Commission can fix maximum ceiling of tariff for retail sale of electricity in the area, to promote competition between the two licensees; iii) In the absence of any indication in the Act or the Tariff Policy, … up a captive power plant at the same location.5. On October 23, 2002, the Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation and JSPL reached an understanding whereby … same area comprising of Jindal Industrial Park and two villages of Tumidih and Punjipathra; ii) Since proviso to Section 62(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short the 'Act') is applicable, the Commission can fix maximum ceiling of

Namrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

General, Competition Commission of India, New Delhi under Section 41 (2) read with Section 36 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the œCompetition Act?), and further a direction has been sought for upon the Competition Commission of … it mentions that as there is no stay order by any Court, in view of the provisions of Section 62 of the Competition Act the Commission is empowered to proceed in view of the notice issued under Section

Union of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

entertain the complaint on the basis of the information of respondent No. 2 under Section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act). The Commission has rejected the stand of the petitioner that it is not an ‘enterprise’ within … 60 of the Act which gives overriding effect to the provisions of the Act and over other laws. Section 62 of the Act provides that the provisions of the Act are in addition to, and not in derogation

Sonam Sharma Vs. Apple Inc. Usa and Others

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI