Advanced Search Results
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2016
MRTP
the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … a cease and desist order or levy penalty; neither of which were effective remedies. He then referred to Section 60 and 61 of the Competition Act which indicated that no Civil Court would have the jurisdiction to entertain … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under:
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamakant Kini Vs. Hiranandani Hospital
Competition Commission of India CCI
Feb-05-2014
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCoal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jun-15-2023
Land Acquisition
the second appellant, Western Coalfields Limited, a subsidiary company of the first appellant cannot be bound by the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). In other words, having regard to the very object and purpose for … Official Liquidator of Esskay Pharmaceuticals Limited6 as also Sanwarmal Kejriwal v. Vishwa Coop. Housing Society Ltd. and Others7). Section 60 of the Act, which declares that the provisions of the Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.
Delhi
Mar-29-2019
Land Acquisition
a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission ...
Delhi
Mar-29-2019
Land Acquisition
a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJose C Mundadan vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Delhi
Mar-29-2019
Land Acquisition
a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askb.k Educational Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Parag Gupta and Associates
Supreme Court of India
Oct-11-2018
Land Acquisition
under Information Technology Act, 2000 Appellate Tribunal under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 under Appellate Tribunal Competition Act, 2002 Appellate Authority under Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Appellate Tribunal Companies Act, 2013 under National Company Law Tribunal … Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Whether there is a provision for application of Limitation Act?. No Yes - Section 60 No No No** Yes - Section 433 Yes - Section 433 No** 8 Securities Appellate Tribunal under Appellate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...
Chennai
Mar-29-2016
MRTP
respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … Section 26(1) of the Act, to investigate the matter and to submit a report within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the order. It was further observed that during the course of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNuziveedu Seeds Ltd. And Ors. Vs.monsanto Technology Llc and Ors.
Delhi
Apr-11-2018
Land Acquisition
14, 2015 to the Nuziveedu group, in effect terminating the license arrangements.12. Cases under Section 19(l)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 against Monsanto and its subsidiaries, were apparently filed before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) filed by the … Sh. Animesh Kumar, Advocate, for applicant in C.M. No.17064/2017. FAO (OS) (COMM) 86/2017 & 76/2017 Page 1 of 60 + FAO (OS) (COMM) 76/2017, CAV. 328/2017, C.M. APPL.13348- 13352/2017 MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC AND ORS. …..Appellants Through: Sh.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others
Delhi
Feb-23-2012
MRTP
entertain the complaint on the basis of the information of respondent No. 2 under Section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act). The Commission has rejected the stand of the petitioner that it is not an ‘enterprise’ within … before the Commission was entirely different from the contractual obligations of the parties. The Commission also relied upon Section 60 of the Act which gives overriding effect to the provisions of the Act and over other laws. Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »