Advanced Search Results

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … from abusing its dominant position. Section 5 of the Competition Act outlines the scope of a 'combination' and Section 6 of the Competition Act prohibits any person or enterprise from entering into a combination, which causes or is … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under:

In Re: Manufacturers of Asbestos Cement Products

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

M/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

cannot render the Final Findings, without referring the matter to the Competition Commission, under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be held to be valid in the eye of law. The issuance of the Disclosure Statement, by … Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, read with Section 9A and 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and to quash the same in respect of goods … calling for the records of the repsondent No.1, Designated Authority F.No.14/45/2010-DGAD dated 6.9.2012, under the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … penalty, is succintly and sequally recorded by the COMPAT in its impugned order. As there is no dispute 6 about the said factual narration, it would be convenient to borrow the said discussion as recorded by the

Inox Leisure Limited vs.competition Commission of India and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

share in the business of exhibition of films. Accordingly, it issued a notice under Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter „the Act‟) seeking approval of its agreement to acquire the film exhibition business of DLF Utilities Ltd

Hemant Sharma and ors Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); Competition Act, 2002 - Section 19(1)(b); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 19(1)(c), 19(1)(g); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946; Central, State or Provincial Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154(3), 156(3); Competition Commission Act, 2002

policy and conduct of respondent No.2 may, therefore, call for examination by the Competition Commission constituted under the Competition Act, 2002.14. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in State of West … investigate a case within its territorial jurisdiction without the concurrence of the State Government, as is required under Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 under which the CBI has been constituted. The Supreme Court

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Sajjan Khaitan Proprietor Vs. Eastern India Motion Picture Association ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Shri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … against similar order (dated 31.10.2014) passed in the other case (No.62/2012) before Competition Appellate Crl.M.C. 4363/2018 etc. Page 6 of 24 Tribunal (“the appellate tribunal”, for short), the said appeal having been dismissed on 17.08.2015, the SLP

Jose C Mundadan vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … against similar order (dated 31.10.2014) passed in the other case (No.62/2012) before Competition Appellate Crl.M.C. 4363/2018 etc. Page 6 of 24 Tribunal (“the appellate tribunal”, for short), the said appeal having been dismissed on 17.08.2015, the SLP