Advanced Search Results

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

in proceedings initiated suo moto by it since it is a dominus litus in such proceedings;49 47 The Competition Act 2002; Section 53S; Also see the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009; Regulation 51 48 (2010) 10 SCC744[104]. 49 … Court effectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit, be added. 58 See Vidus Impex & Traders Ltd. v. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 8 SCC384 Thomson Press (India) Ltd.

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … APPEAL No.6365 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5993-5994 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.5774 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.5775 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.5776 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5832-5833 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.5777 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.5778 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.6317 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.8953 OF20143 CIVIL APPEAL No.6372 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL

Ramakant Kini Vs. Hiranandani Hospital

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association Vs. Nbcc (i ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … sum of Rs. 594 Crores as on 31.12.2019. It is an admitted fact that mobilisation advance of Rs. 586 Crores is due and payable by JAL and JIL as on 31.12.2019, out of which JAL says, after

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : Land Acquisition

the above-said clauses were described as ex-facie unfair and discriminatory attracting the provisions of section 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter "Act"). It was urged that this amounted to abuse of dominant position by the Appellant. A complaint … for such questions, but the agreements were actually signed almost two or three years prior to that date. 58. The only reason why these agreements are being pressed into service is on the basis of the fact

Gvk Airport Holdings Limited vs.bid Services Division (Mauritius) Limi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

account of events subsequent to execution of the SHA in 2006, being: (i) the relevant provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 coming into force in 2011; and (ii) the agreement being entered into by lenders with MIAL in 2017 … Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.3. for CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “Arbitration Act”) has been filed, inter alia seeking grant … Limited Dubai v. Vedanta Aluminium India (2010) 3 SCC1@ Para 49, 50, 58-60, 63, 64, Old World Hospitality Private Limited v. India Habitat Centre 1996

Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commr. of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)109ITD1(Delhi)

guidance fee etc. of the on going business. It is common knowledge and there is a cut through competition in the automobile market and the assessee is required to bring new models in the market in order … by the assessing officer), without providing reasonable opportunity of being heard as provided in Section 251(2) of the Act.The assessee has submitted that it had filed returns of income for both the assessment years declaring therein loss … orders dated 24.08.2005 of CIT(A), Ghaziabad, for the assessment years 2001-2002 & 2002-2003 respectively. Since the issues involved in both the appeals are common, these … the earlier assessment year, the claim of the assessee amounting to Rs. 58.30 lacs as provision for warranty was allowed. He further drew our attention

Union of India Through Executive Engineer, Mumbai Central Division No. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

provided otherwise was a clear abuse of dominant position. The respondent placed reliance on Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 in support of this contention. In the said letter, the respondent alleged that the respondent had always shown

Colgate-palmolive (India) Limited Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCivil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1987; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 36A, 36(1) and 55; Lanham Act; Federal Trade Commission Act - Sections 5(1), 12, 15 and 15(1); Broadcasting Act, 1981; Cable Broadcasting Act, 1984; European Communities Act; Young Persons (Harmful Publications) Act, 1956; Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use)Act, 1950; Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986; Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994; Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Prize Competition Act, 1955; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978; Cigarettes and other Tobacco Product

Reported in : (2008)7MLJ1119; 2009(40)PTC653(Mad)

unfair trade practice.55. However, The MRTP Act, 1969 is sought to be repealed by Section 66 of The Competition Act, 2002 ( Section 66 does not appear to have been notified so far). But fortunately, the power to enquire … restraint against malicious falsehood was quoted with approval, in Boehringer Ingelheim Limited v. Vetplus Ltd. 2007 EWCA Civ 583, by a Three Member Bench of the Court of Appeal. However a note of caution was also added