Advanced Search Results
Cross Land Marketing (2000) Pte. Ltd. Vs. the Food Corporation of Indi ...
Delhi
Nov-21-2013
MRTP
provisions of the repealed Act, i.e., the MRTP Act, and not in accordance with the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, they do not have a right to challenge the impugned order by way of an appeal in terms … the order passed by the MRTP Commission on an application under Section 12B of the said Act. However, Section 53T of the Competition Act, provides for an appeal to the Supreme Court against an order passed by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskApoorva Agencies Vs. Food Corporation of India and anr.
Delhi
Nov-21-2013
MRTP
provisions of the repealed Act, i.e., the MRTP Act, and not in accordance with the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, they do not have a right to challenge the impugned order by way of an appeal in terms … the order passed by the MRTP Commission on an application under Section 12B of the said Act. However, Section 53T of the Competition Act, provides for an appeal to the Supreme Court against an order passed by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.K. Granites Vs. Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Company Limite
Delhi
Nov-21-2013
MRTP
provisions of the repealed Act, i.e., the MRTP Act, and not in accordance with the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, they do not have a right to challenge the impugned order by way of an appeal in terms … the order passed by the MRTP Commission on an application under Section 12B of the said Act. However, Section 53T of the Competition Act, provides for an appeal to the Supreme Court against an order passed by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vicnivaas Agency Vs. Mmtc Limited
Delhi
Nov-21-2013
MRTP
provisions of the repealed Act, i.e., the MRTP Act, and not in accordance with the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, they do not have a right to challenge the impugned order by way of an appeal in terms … the order passed by the MRTP Commission on an application under Section 12B of the said Act. However, Section 53T of the Competition Act, provides for an appeal to the Supreme Court against an order passed by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVicnivaas Agency Vs. Food Corporation of India
Delhi
Nov-21-2013
MRTP
provisions of the repealed Act, i.e., the MRTP Act, and not in accordance with the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, they do not have a right to challenge the impugned order by way of an appeal in terms … the order passed by the MRTP Commission on an application under Section 12B of the said Act. However, Section 53T of the Competition Act, provides for an appeal to the Supreme Court against an order passed by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBela Rani Bhattcharyya Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Jul-02-2014
Land Acquisition
Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) to be not maintainable owing to the remedy of appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 being available thereagainst. The learned Single Judge having not gone into the merits of the writ petition, need
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinkar Kumar and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Delhi
Nov-05-2014
MRTP
1992; (5) Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969; (6) Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002; (7) Section 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007; (8) Section 22 of the National
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager
Supreme Court of India
Nov-13-2019
Land Acquisition
India (CCI), which was envisioned to maintain adequate competition in the market and protect consumer welfare. Further, the Competition Act, 2002 was later enacted which provided certain powers of Civil Courts to the CCI for effective enquiry and adjudication.37. … the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskScm Solifert Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India
Supreme Court of India
Apr-17-2018
Land Acquisition
ARUN MISHRA, J.1. The appellants SCM Solifert Limited and another are in appeal under section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) as against the final judgment and order dated 30.08.2016 passed in Appeal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudha Gupta Vs. Dlf Ltd
Supreme Court of India
Mar-07-2019
Land Acquisition
Sanjiv Khanna, J.1. Appellant Sudha Gupta, who appears inperson in the present appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 read with Section 55 of the repealed Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 impugns order dated 8th
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »