Advanced Search Results

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of India and Another

M/S. Muthoot Finance Limited, vs Competition Commission of India,

Court : Kerala

Matched in: Parties M/S. Muthoot Finance Limited, vs Competition Commission of India,

Jyoti Sawroop Arora Vs. The Competition Commission of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Jyoti Sawroop Arora Vs. The Competition Commission of India and Others

Competition Commission of India vs.m/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Competition Commission of India vs.m/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.

Watters Vs. Wachovia Bank, N. A.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Title IV, §403, 96 Stat. 1510. While these changes have enabled national banks to engage in more evenhanded competition with state banks, they certainly reflect no purpose to give them any competitive advantage.[ Footnote 9 ] Second, … and submit to state supervision. Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§445.1656(1), 445.1679(1)(a) (West 2002), 493.52(1), and 493.53a(d) (West 1998).[ Footnote 2 ] From 1997 until 2003, … of appeals for the sixth circuit No. 05-1342. Argued November 29, 2006-Decided April 17, 2007 National banks’ business activities are controlled by the National Bank Act (NBA), 12 U. S. C. §1 et seq ., and regulations … does national banks. §5.34(e)(3) (“An operating subsidiary conducts activities authorized under this section pursuant to the same authorization, terms and conditions that apply to the

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Director, Chennai Vs. The Competition Commission of India, Rep., by its Registrar, New Delhi and Others

Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of the Act and

Jitender Bhargava Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Jitender Bhargava Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others