Advanced Search Results

Sri Agasteswara Swamy Temple, Vangipuram Vs. V.Siva Kameswara Rao and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

Steel Authority of India Limited and another1, the Supreme Court considered the scope of Section 53-A(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ( which provided for an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against any directions issued or a decision made … THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1131 of 2012 31-12-2013 Sri Agasteswara Swamy Temple, Vangipuram Village....APPELLANT V.Siva Kameswara Rao and another...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:Sri V.T.M.Prasad

M/S Pradeep Colonisers and Suppliers Pvt Ltd vs M/S Mbl Infrastructure ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002, the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that Act prior to … the amount to be paid to such creditors in the event of liquidation of the corporate debtor under Section 53; or the2021 SCC OnLine SC 313O.M.P. (COMM) 469/2025 & connected matters Page 16 of 85 amount that would … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 10.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ O.M.P.

Adani Gas Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of an amendment, in 2004 to the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, defining, by Section 2 (o) “non-performing assets” was challenged, on the ground of excessive delegation, as it left … There are other functions too, including regulating access to common or contract carriers to ensure fair trade and competition among the entities, specifying the pipe- line access code regulating transportation rates for common or contract carriers and … of 20012(hereafter called “Special Reference”), had ruled that in view of Entry 53, List I of the Seventh Schedule, the Parliament had exclusive legislative competence,

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … agencies, which include CCI and COMPAT, have to ensure that these objectives are fulfilled by curbing anti-competitive agreements.” 5370) The Court also mentioned, in particular, that competition leads to economic efficiency, economic growth and development as well … 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3546 OF2014RAJASTHAN CYLINDERS AND CONTAINERS LIMITED

Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

without prejudice to termination notice. CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 50 of 96 65. The Parliament had enacted the Competition Act, 2002, some of the provisions of which came into force on 31.3.2003, its objective being to provide, keeping in … encoding said δ-endotoxin protein.‖ seed or plant cells containing [Claim nos.9 and 53 being directed to a plant tissue and claim nos.48 to 52 and … injunction CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 1 of 96 under Rules 1 and 2 of Order XXXIX read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been made, by application (IA24062016), resulting in some … $ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:15. th February, 2017 Pronounced on:28th

Competition Commission of India Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(in short, “the Tribunal”) setting aside the order passed by the Competition Commission under section 43A of the Competition Act, 2002 (in short, referred to as “the Act”) whereby penalty of Rupees One Crore 2 was imposed on the … the Act. As against the same the appeal was preferred. The Tribunal has allowed the appeal filed under section 53 B of the Act and has set aside the order passed by the Commission. Aggrieved thereby, the appeal … 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.13578 OF 2015 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF

M.k. Rajagopalan Vs. Dr. Periasamy Palani Gounder

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … to dissenting financial creditors shall not be less than the amount paid to such creditors in accordance with Section 53 in the event of liquidation of the corporate debtor. Therefore, resolution applicant was asked to further revise the … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1682-1683 OF2022M.K. RAJAGOPALAN ..……. APPELLANT(S)

State Tax Officer (1) Vs. Rainbow Papers Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … by the dealer on account of tax, interest, penalty etc. under the said GVAT Act, cannot prevail over Section 53 of the IBC.2. The short question raised by the appellant in this appeal is, whether the provisions of … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1661 OF2020STATE TAX OFFICER (1) ...APPELLANT(S)

M/S Oss Air Management Pvt. Ltd. Vs.s.k. Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the contract as a violation of Section 23 of the Contract Act and Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 since it was not the respondent's prayer that any part of the contract be declared as void by … * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 03.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 398/2016 + M/S OSS AIR MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.

Shri V.C. Nannapaneni Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)94ITD309(Hyd.)

of the apex court in the case of Gilander Arbuthnot v. CIT, 53 ITR 283, wherein the court observed that a payment received to compensate … certain variety in the markets of Russia and CIS countries, even after selling the existing market to the competitor. The AO was of the view that the term 'non-competition' should not be seen in isolation, but has … the other side. Natco Group agreed to refrain from selling, supplying, marketing, distributing, advising, assigning, aiding and establishing/managing/providing/developing, acting as consultant or technical advisor in respect of the specified products or any similar products, in the territories … it was brought to tax under the head 'capital gains' as per Section 55(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The AO was of the view … 1. These three appeals are directed against orders of the CIT (Appeals) III, Hyderabad. Since the