Advanced Search Results
Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association Vs. Nbcc (i ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-24-2021
Land Acquisition
that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … Regulation 38(1)(b) of the CIRP Regulations; and such payment has to be a liquidated sum, as stated under Section 53 of the Code. Per contra, it was contended on behalf of the resolution applicant and the IRP that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Fast Way Transmission Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Kansan News Pvt. L ...
Competition Appellate Tribunal
May-02-2014
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Appellate Tribunal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Tax Officer (1) Vs. Rainbow Papers Limited
Supreme Court of India
Sep-06-2022
Education
that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … by the dealer on account of tax, interest, penalty etc. under the said GVAT Act, cannot prevail over Section 53 of the IBC.2. The short question raised by the appellant in this appeal is, whether the provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri Agasteswara Swamy Temple, Vangipuram Vs. V.Siva Kameswara Rao and ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-31-2013
Education
Steel Authority of India Limited and another1, the Supreme Court considered the scope of Section 53-A(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ( which provided for an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against any directions issued or a decision made
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Pradeep Colonisers and Suppliers Pvt Ltd vs M/S Mbl Infrastructure ...
Delhi
May-04-2026
Arbitration
that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002, the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that Act prior to … the amount to be paid to such creditors in the event of liquidation of the corporate debtor under Section 53; or the2021 SCC OnLine SC 313O.M.P. (COMM) 469/2025 & connected matters Page 16 of 85 amount that would
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAirports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-18-2024
MRTP
in proceedings initiated suo moto by it since it is a dominus litus in such proceedings;49 47 The Competition Act 2002; Section 53S; Also see the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009; Regulation 51 48 (2010) 10 SCC744[104]. 49 … No.8217 of 2023 With Civil Appeal No.7767 of 2023 With Civil Appeal Nos.10691-10692 of 2024 Page 1 of 53 With Civil Appeal No.393 of 2024 With Civil Appeal No.10678 of 2024 And With Civil Appeal No.10659 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2016
MRTP
the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under: … lack of understanding of the subject prior to directing investigation against Ericsson. 53. Ms. Singh also sought to dispute Mr. Kathpalia's interpretation of proviso of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr
Supreme Court of India
Oct-01-2018
MRTP
indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … agencies, which include CCI and COMPAT, have to ensure that these objectives are fulfilled by curbing anti-competitive agreements.” 5370) The Court also mentioned, in particular, that competition leads to economic efficiency, economic growth and development as well
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCompetition Commission of India Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. .
Supreme Court of India
Apr-17-2018
Land Acquisition
(in short, “the Tribunal”) setting aside the order passed by the Competition Commission under section 43A of the Competition Act, 2002 (in short, referred to as “the Act”) whereby penalty of Rupees One Crore 2 was imposed on the … the Act. As against the same the appeal was preferred. The Tribunal has allowed the appeal filed under section 53 B of the Act and has set aside the order passed by the Commission. Aggrieved thereby, the appeal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAll India Tyre Dealersâ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers
Competition Commission of India CCI
Oct-30-2012
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »