Advanced Search Results

Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

without prejudice to termination notice. CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 50 of 96 65. The Parliament had enacted the Competition Act, 2002, some of the provisions of which came into force on 31.3.2003, its objective being to provide, keeping in … 96 variety, extant variety, transgenic variety, farmers' variety and essentially derived variety.‖ 51. The Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 earlier promulgated by the Central Government had … injunction CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 1 of 96 under Rules 1 and 2 of Order XXXIX read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been made, by application (IA24062016), resulting in some

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of the Act and … the duties imposed on it by W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 51 of 152 the Commission or under the provisions of this Act and

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

in proceedings initiated suo moto by it since it is a dominus litus in such proceedings;49 47 The Competition Act 2002; Section 53S; Also see the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009; Regulation 51 48 (2010) 10 SCC744[104]. 49

Variety Entertainment (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : AIR2008Ori172

monopoly in the cable network business.' Learned Counsel also placed reliance on the aims and objectives of the Competition Act, 2002 and in particular, placed stress on the object of the aforesaid Act which is to provide keeping in … distribution companies which are in charge of electrical supports/assets in their control and further that, in terms of Section 51 of the Electricity Act, 2003 the distribution companies have the mandate to optimally utilize their assets in order

M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : Land Acquisition

the above-said clauses were described as ex-facie unfair and discriminatory attracting the provisions of section 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter "Act"). It was urged that this amounted to abuse of dominant position by the Appellant. A complaint … cancelling the allotment of his apartment for non-payment of dues and consequent forfeiture of an amount of Rs. 51,00,000/-. 23. It was also stated that the Appellant had given false information to SEBI while seeking permission for

Arappor Iyakkam vs the Director

Court : Chennai

bid collusiion and conspiracy to defraud the exchequer by making redundant the TN Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998, Competition Act, 2002 and other laws.Status report of DVAC: 13.1. During the course of the hearing, on 6.4.2026, the DVAC filed … finalize the rates or awards and where identical prices are quoted, allocation will be following the provisions in Section 10 (5) of the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998 and Rule 31 of the Tamil Nadu

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … effectively exercise its right to appeal in terms of Section 53 of the Act.105. Furthermore, Regulations 14(4) and 51 support the view that the Commission can be a necessary or a proper party in the proceedings before

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1 … effectively exercise its right to appeal in terms of Section 53 of the Act.105. Furthermore, Regulations 14(4) and 51 support the view that the Commission can be a necessary or a proper party in the proceedings before

Espn Star Sports Vs. Global Broadcast News Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 18, 19, 30, 37, 37(3), 39, 39A, 51, 52, 52B, 53, 55, 58, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 64, 65 and 66; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 9; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : LC2008(3)257; 2008(38)PTC477(Del)

news channel and such programme is also liberally interspersed with commercials. This would also amount to a direct competition with ESS since ESS also comes out with sporting news. c. He submitted that while fair dealing cannot … C. A. on the ground that the license Agreement dated July 26, 2002 produced in Court redacted crucial sections of the Agreement, particularly, those dealing … clearly crystallizing the nature of such rights. (b) The fact that such a distinction exists is demonstrated by Section 51 of the Copyright Act which deals with acts constituting infringement of a copyright, whereas there is a separate