Advanced Search Results

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was

Dhanraj Pillay Vs. Hockey India

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Competition Commission of India vs.m/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of the CCI, stating that GIL had abused its dominant position, in terms of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 („Act‟). 1.3 The learned Single Judge has, in the impugned judgment, held that inasmuch as the direction issued … used or relied for any purpose. Reliance is placed on the decision in Institute of Chartered Accountants v. L.K. Ratna, (1986) 4 SCC537and Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Ravi Cheloor (1989) 178 ITR640(Ker).21. Mr Mehta distinguished the

M/S Stelling Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (railyatri.in) and Anr. Vs.indian ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

impose restrictions on its business model. Further any such restriction would be contrary to the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002.63. In conclusion he would state that the present matter does not involve any disputed questions of fact … of tickets except in circumstances as prescribed under Section 56 of the Railway Act, and in terms of Section 50 of the Railway Act, IRCTC is obligated to supply tickets on payment of fare and has no discretion

Colgate-palmolive (India) Limited Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCivil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1987; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 36A, 36(1) and 55; Lanham Act; Federal Trade Commission Act - Sections 5(1), 12, 15 and 15(1); Broadcasting Act, 1981; Cable Broadcasting Act, 1984; European Communities Act; Young Persons (Harmful Publications) Act, 1956; Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use)Act, 1950; Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986; Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994; Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Prize Competition Act, 1955; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978; Cigarettes and other Tobacco Product

Reported in : (2008)7MLJ1119; 2009(40)PTC653(Mad)

unfair trade practice.55. However, The MRTP Act, 1969 is sought to be repealed by Section 66 of The Competition Act, 2002 ( Section 66 does not appear to have been notified so far). But fortunately, the power to enquire … interest in his property or trade'. In its chapter on Libel and Slander, American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Volume 50 declares that -Generally, the publication of any false and malicious statement which tends to disparage the quality, condition,

M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : Land Acquisition

the above-said clauses were described as ex-facie unfair and discriminatory attracting the provisions of section 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter "Act"). It was urged that this amounted to abuse of dominant position by the Appellant. A complaint … Rs. 250 per sq. ft. while after the revised plans the prospective buyers were given discount @ Rs. 500 per sq. ft. A reference was also made to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. A

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

in proceedings initiated suo moto by it since it is a dominus litus in such proceedings;49 47 The Competition Act 2002; Section 53S; Also see the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009; Regulation 51 48 (2010) 10 SCC744[104]. 49 … guidelines for determining various matters of larger public interest; and (iii) affect the economic policy of the country. 50 See Brahm Dutt v. Union of India, AIR2005SC73051 (2010) 10 SCC744[106]. 52 “2009 Regulation” 53 The Competition Commission

Namrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

General, Competition Commission of India, New Delhi under Section 41 (2) read with Section 36 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the œCompetition Act?), and further a direction has been sought for upon the Competition Commission of … disinvestment of those units whose annual loss was more than Rs. 10 crores and eroded net worth by 50 percent or more. It is stated that net worth of the Sugar Corporation had been eroded more than

Competition Commission of India Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(in short, “the Tribunal”) setting aside the order passed by the Competition Commission under section 43A of the Competition Act, 2002 (in short, referred to as “the Act”) whereby penalty of Rupees One Crore 2 was imposed on the

M.k. Rajagopalan Vs. Dr. Periasamy Palani Gounder

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … model timelines stipulated under the Regulations. For instance, an avoidance Application as found in Section 43, 45 and 50 can be filed either by the RP or by the Liquidator and the model timeline prescribed under the