Advanced Search Results

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … this stage itself that inquiry was started against 47 companies. The CCI exonerated two companies and found that 45 companies had entered into an arrangement/agreement insofar as statements of bids pursuant to tenders issued by IOCL are

M/S. Muthoot Finance Limited, vs Competition Commission of India,

Court : Kerala

the extent to which it finds that there is a prima facie violation of Section 45 of the Competition Act, 2002.2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows: Petitioner is apublicly listed company

K. Sunil Kini Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(2),

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)6SOT139(Bang.)

taxed as business income relying on clause (va) of section 28 inserted into the statute book by Finance Act, 2002, with effect from 1-4-2003.The Commissioner (Appeals), in the first appeal, had accepted the assessee's claim that the receipt … 1-4-2003 the position is that such receipts are liable to be taxed both under section 28 and under section 45. This is an absurd situation. If the Legislature had intended the relevant amendments effected by the Finance Act,

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … of India (General) Regulations, 2009, and in particular, Regulation Nos.16, 18, 20, 21, 35, 41(1), 41(2), 41(5), 42, 45 and 46. The learned counsel referred to paragraphs 24 to 27 of the impugned order, as regards the

Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association Vs. Nbcc (i ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … if any, observed, found or determined by him- (a) preferential transactions under section 43; (b) undervalued transactions under section 45; 66 This Regulation 39 has also undergone wide ranging amendments, the relevant of which are indicated hereinbelow. 67

R.K. Swamy Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)88ITD185(Chennai)

the amount received under separate agreement for non-competition.4.10 Moreover Sub-clause (va) to Section 28 introduced by the Finance Act, 2002 with effect from 1-4-2003 would strengthen the view of the appellant regarding non-taxability of the receipt of non-compete … of the Income-tax Act, as the sum of Rs. 3.2 crores was nothing but capital gains chargeable under Section 45 of the Income-tax Act inasmuch as from the various information provided it was obvious that the sum was

Forech India Limited Vs. Competition Commission of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

November, 2015 and 2nd December, 2015 remain the same and bind the respondents. The application is disposed of. Competition Act, 2002 Section 26(1) Validity of order Petitioner challenged order of first Respondent under Section 26(1) of the Act as well … mails, may be stating something that may not be entirely correct and exposing them to penal action under Section 45 of the Act; xii) that the petitioner apprehends that the respondents, in the guise of confidentiality, are suppressing

The State Of Gujarat And Anr. Vs. M/s. Saw Pipes Ltd. (known As Jindal ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Section 78(5).6.8 In the case of Competition Commission of India (supra) while considering Section 43A of the Competition Act, 2002 which provides for a penalty, it is observed in paragraphs 34 to 37 as under: ­ “34. If … Division Bench of the High Court has set aside the penalty and interest levied under sub­section (6) of Section 45 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1969), the State of Gujarat

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of the Act and … Section 25 to 27 relating to legal tender and bank notes; Section 45JA - power of RBI to determine policy and issue directions etc.); other