Advanced Search Results
Competition Commission of India Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. .
Supreme Court of India
Apr-17-2018
Land Acquisition
(in short, “the Tribunal”) setting aside the order passed by the Competition Commission under section 43A of the Competition Act, 2002 (in short, referred to as “the Act”) whereby penalty of Rupees One Crore 2 was imposed on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Of Gujarat And Anr. Vs. M/s. Saw Pipes Ltd. (known As Jindal ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-17-2023
Land Acquisition
under Section 78(5).6.8 In the case of Competition Commission of India (supra) while considering Section 43A of the Competition Act, 2002 which provides for a penalty, it is observed in paragraphs 34 to 37 as under: “34. If
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRci Power Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-18-2003
Electricity
Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 11, 11(1), 12, 12(3), 15(4), 26, 26(5), 54(2), 56(2) and 56(3); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 29; Transfer Scheme Rules
AIR2004AP60; 2003(3)ALD762
of Reform and Restructure is to create conditions for the sustainable development of its Power Sector through promoting competition, efficiency, transparency and attracting the much needed private finances into the Power Sector. The ultimate goal of the … Swamy, J. 1. Petitioners in Writ Petition Nos. 4770 and 4771 of 2002 are the appellants in CMA Nos. 1351 and 1356 of 2001. These … may be, may, from time to time specify in this behalf.33. While Section 43(3) was omitted, a new Section 43A was inserted. Under Sub-section (1) of Section 43A--A Generating Company may enter into a contract for the sale … 41 Generating Companies entered into agreements with the Board before the Reforms Act came into force and 20 Generating Companies entered into agreements after the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of the Act and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. R.V.K. Energy Pvt. Ltd. and ...
Supreme Court of India
May-16-2008
Electricity
Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(4), 13(5), 14, 14(1), 14(4), 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 21, 21(4), 26, 39 and 41(1); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4)(A), 2(5), 2(6), 3, 18A, 18A(2), 26A, 43A and 43A(1); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 3 and 28; Indian Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 10(2), 14 and 42(2); Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Reform Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 14, 14(1), 16, 33 and 37(1); Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Second Order, 2005; Electricity (Supply) Rules; Indian Electricity Rules; Companies Act, 1956; ;Indian Electricity Regulations
2008LC(SC)550; JT2008(7)SC138; 2008(9)SCALE529; 2008AIRSCW6536
other parts of the country as also from outside the country was highlighted. It intended to bring about competition in the industry. It is stated to have taken a series of measures for augmenting power including privatization. … licence or sanction that was granted under the 1910 Act. It furthermore held that any approval envisaged under Section 43A of the 1948 Act granted to a generating company for sale of electricity did not authorize the supply … respective appeals including the proceeding before the Commission.CIVIL APPEAL No. 8093 OF 200213. Permission was granted to LVS Power Ltd. to set up a 37.8
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskScm Solifert Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India
Supreme Court of India
Apr-17-2018
Land Acquisition
ARUN MISHRA, J.1. The appellants SCM Solifert Limited and another are in appeal under section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) as against the final judgment and order dated 30.08.2016 passed in Appeal … by the 1 Competition Appellate Tribunal thereby affirming the order passed by the Competition Commission of India under section 43A of the Act. 2. The Competition Commission of India initiated the proceedings against the appellants on whom due
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/s Jindal Steel Through Its Managing D ...
Supreme Court of India
Dec-06-2023
Direct Taxation
which any buyer or seller may trade and in which prices and product availability are determined by free competition. P. Ramanatha Aiyer’s Advanced Law Lexicon has also defined the expression “open market” to mean a market in … day of April, 1997 and ending on the 31st day of March, 2002 : Provided that in a case where an undertaking develops an industrial … dispose of, on such terms as may be agreed upon. Such a provision, he submits, finds manifestation in Section 43A whereby and whereunder a generating company has been given the liberty to enter into a contract for the … courts dismissing its appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The core and common issue raised in all the appeals is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNtpc Limited Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Jan-22-2007
Land Acquisition
(2007)LCAPTEL7
NTPC generating stations was fixed at 80 per cent.10. On 7^th February, 2002, the NTPC filed a Petition, being Petition No. 31 /2001, before the … be increased to 2.25 MMSCM. On 30^th April, 1994, Notification was issued by the Government of India under Section 43A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, whereby Tariff for Kawas GPS was determined for the period upto 31^st … it was pointed out that GUVNL had requested the NTPC to arrange gas supply from various agencies at competitive prices, so as to achieve maximum utilization of Kawas and Gandhar power stations. It was also claimed in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHonda Siel Power Products Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Apr-21-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)112TTJ(Delhi)702
the CIT(A) and dismiss the ground. We may also note that Section 43A was amended by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1st April, 2003. The new section provides that adjustment in respect of fluctuation of foreign exchange shall … by the sections. The argument of the assessee before the IT authorities was that in view of the competition and the corresponding need to develop and maintain the image of the company as also to provide satisfactory
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJitender Bhargava Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others
Competition Appellate Tribunal
Mar-27-2014
MRTP
against the Order passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter called CCI) under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act 2002 (the Act) permitting the Combination of two airlines namely Etihad Airways PJSC and Jet Airways (India) Ltd. In … section 26, section 27, section 28, section 31, section 32, section 33, section 38, section 39, section 43, section 43A, section 44, section 45 or section 46 of this Act. b) to adjudicate on claim for compensation that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »