Advanced Search Results

Espn Star Sports Vs. Global Broadcast News Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 18, 19, 30, 37, 37(3), 39, 39A, 51, 52, 52B, 53, 55, 58, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 64, 65 and 66; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 9; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : LC2008(3)257; 2008(38)PTC477(Del)

news channel and such programme is also liberally interspersed with commercials. This would also amount to a direct competition with ESS since ESS also comes out with sporting news. c. He submitted that while fair dealing cannot … C. A. on the ground that the license Agreement dated July 26, 2002 produced in Court redacted crucial sections of the Agreement, particularly, those dealing … known as broadcast reproduction rights. The content and extent of that right has been defined in Section 37. Section 39-A of the Act refers to certain provisions of the Act, it has inspired an argument that the absence

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … that the ‘facilitating factors’ which may be ‘considered conducive for cartelisation’ are present. The D.G. found that 9 39 ‘in all the probability, prices were fixed there at the meeting in Bombay in collusion with each other.

K. L. Suneja Vs. Dr. (mrs.) Manjeet Kaur Monga (d) Through Her Lr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

complainant and / or the public in general. The MRTP Act was repealed by Section 66 of the Competition Act, 2002 which was brought into force w.e.f. 1st September 2009. Chapter VIII-A introduced subsequently provided for establishment of an

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

any W.P.(C) 3044/2016 Page 7 of 27 information, and as an illustration, reference to Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 was made. The learned Senior Counsel also referred to Section 21(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which

Krishak Bharti Co-operative Ltd. Vs. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984; ;Multi-State Co-Operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 29, 43(1), 91(1), 115 and 122; ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; ;Bombay Cooperative Societies Act, 1925; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 169 and 286

Reported in : 125(2005)DLT45; 2005(85)DRJ183

by the provisions of the said Act until the enactment of the new Act viz. Multi-State Co-Operative Societies Act, 2002 (Act 39 of 2002) (for short the Act). They are primarily engaged in the business of manufacture, sale … eligible for being a member of a multi-State cooperative society if his business is in conflict or in competition with the business of such multi-State cooperative society, while Section 43 & (k) of the Act provides that

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the second appellant, Western Coalfields Limited, a subsidiary company of the first appellant cannot be bound by the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). In other words, having regard to the very object and purpose for … does not deal with a company like the appellant. In other words, while there may be indication in Section 19(4)(g) of the Act that the fact that a body is a monopoly under the statute may indicate … important, geared and duty bound to achieve the objects declared in Article 39(b) of the 2 Constitution of India and the second appellant, Western Coalfields

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Intel Technology India Pvt Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter ‘Commission’) whereby in exercise of powers under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter ‘2002 Act’) an investigation as to whether their warranty policy has (i) potentially resulted in denial of … business groups. It drew its inspiration directly from the Directive Principles of State Policy in Articles 38 and 39 of the Constitution…Its core chapter on concentration of economic power singled out “large” undertakings (those whose assets, together

Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Intex Technologies (India) ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

claimed that the plaintiff is one of the largest telecommunications companies in the world. The Ericsson group is active in more than 180 countries having annual sales of USD35Billion (approximately) for the year 2013. The Ericsson’s main … plaintiff has filed the interim application being I.A. No.6735/2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. By this order, I propose to decide the abovementioned application.3. The facts stated in the plaint … the plaintiff has filed the interim application being I.A. No.6735/2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. By this order,

Re: Special Reference No. 1 of 2012 [Under Article 143(1) of the Const ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 143(1), 141, 137; Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 40 Rule 1

to be fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory, transparent, non-capricious, unbiased, without favouritism or nepotism, in pursuit of promotion of healthy competition and equitable treatment. It should conform to the norms which are rational, informed with reasons and guided by … action which may be taken by other investigating agencies under Income Tax Act, 1961, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and other similar statutes."It needs to be noticed that a review petition came to be filed by the … methods of distribution, which would include classes, industries, regions, private and public sections, etc. Having regard to the basic nature of Article 39(b), a narrower