Advanced Search Results

Espn Star Sports Vs. Global Broadcast News Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 18, 19, 30, 37, 37(3), 39, 39A, 51, 52, 52B, 53, 55, 58, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 64, 65 and 66; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 9; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : LC2008(3)257; 2008(38)PTC477(Del)

news channel and such programme is also liberally interspersed with commercials. This would also amount to a direct competition with ESS since ESS also comes out with sporting news. c. He submitted that while fair dealing cannot … C. A. on the ground that the license Agreement dated July 26, 2002 produced in Court redacted crucial sections of the Agreement, particularly, those dealing … of rights known as broadcast reproduction rights. The content and extent of that right has been defined in Section 37. Section 39-A of the Act refers to certain provisions of the Act, it has inspired an argument that

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … names of group companies as well as non-group 9 companies. He came to the conclusion that in all 37 entities could not be said to be belonging to any single group and were independently controlled. The Director

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

India (CCI), which was envisioned to maintain adequate competition in the market and protect consumer welfare. Further, the Competition Act, 2002 was later enacted which provided certain powers of Civil Courts to the CCI for effective enquiry and adjudication.37. … out a case that such phraseology was deliberately incorporated in the Constitution by making a conscious departure from Section 37 of the Government of India Act, 1935. Inclusion of Part XIV in the Finance Act, 2017 is shown

Girish Chandra Gupta and ors. Vs. Uttar Pradesh Industrial Development ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 12B, 10, 36B; Competition Act, 2002 - Section 66(1)

Trade Practices Commission (for short 'the MRTP Commission') constituted under the MRTP Act. By Section 66(1) of the Competition Act, 2002, the MRTP Act was repealed and the MRTP Commission was dissolved. Section 66(3) of the Competition Act, 2002 … and unfair trade practices carried on by any person or undertaking under Section 10, Section 36B or Section 37(1) of the MRTP Act before issuing notice in the application filed under Section 12B of the MRTP Act

Nagole Auto Drivers Welfare Association Represented by President, K. S ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

any W.P.(C) 3044/2016 Page 7 of 27 information, and as an illustration, reference to Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 was made. The learned Senior Counsel also referred to Section 21(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which

income Tax Officer Vs. Mugatlal B and Sons

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)100TTJ(Ahd.)1042

of five years. The aforesaid increase in sales in the city of Surat wherein there is a keen competition and particularly in the assessee's business. It is the case of the assessee that the increase in net … detailed paper book which was forwarded to the AO on 12th Feb., 2002 to give his comments/report. The AO submitted his remand report vide letter … maintained. The matter in question is basically pertaining to the assessee's trading activity of galvanized black pipe and pipe fittings. While finalizing the assessment, it … law, the learned CIT(A)-IV, Surat, has erred in ignoring the fact that within the ambit of Explanation to Section 37(1), the payment cannot be treated as allowable business expenditure merely on the ground of commercial expediency. Evidence regarding

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … require the opinion of experts [Section 36 (3)].. Significantly, CCI has no power to review its orders: previously, Section 37 permitted review; however, the 2007 amendment repealed that provision; it has limited rectification power, under Section 38. In

Apm Terminals B.V. Vs Union of India and anr ,

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act; Major Port Trusts Act - Sections 111, 42(3); Indian Ports Act; Electricity Act - Sections 178, 79(1)(j)

the effect of altering the policy with regard to entrustment of operational facilities at the port to provide competition and to prevent monopolies, the provisions of Clause 8.31 would have to be reconsidered in the light of … participate in any subsequent bid for operation of the Container Terminal.7. In 2002, JNPT floated another Tender for the development of the Second Container Terminal … Joint Venture Company under the name and style of "Gateway Terminals India Pvt. Ltd." registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The said Joint Venture Company, hereinafter referred to as the "GTI", was the successful bidder in the … a contractual right could be superseded by a general policy decision under Section 111 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, without any legislation. In