Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: competition act 2002 section 35 · Page 1 of about 1,131 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 29 2016

Chettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-29-2016

Subject : MRTP

respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … made to the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009, and in particular, Regulation Nos.16, 18, 20, 21, 35, 41(1), 41(2), 41(5), 42, 45 and 46. The learned counsel referred to paragraphs 24 to 27 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2019

Competition Commission of India vs.m/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-2019

Subject : MRTP

of the CCI, stating that GIL had abused its dominant position, in terms of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 („Act‟). 1.3 The learned Single Judge has, in the impugned judgment, held that inasmuch as the direction issued … (2) The GIL provides segmental discounts for export or domestic consumption on the condition that a minimum of 35% content of VSF is necessary in yarn. In case the content of VSF is less than that, no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2019

Shri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 29 2019

M/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2019

Jose C Mundadan vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-29-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2018

Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Vigilance Commission

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

any W.P.(C) 3044/2016 Page 7 of 27 information, and as an illustration, reference to Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 was made. The learned Senior Counsel also referred to Section 21(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which … on a complaint made to him”. The Advocates Act, 1961 also has provisions for conducting suo motu inquiry. Section 35 and 36 of the Advocates Act, 1961 specifically provides that the Bar Council of India, “on receipt of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2014

M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Decided on : May-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the above-said clauses were described as ex-facie unfair and discriminatory attracting the provisions of section 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter "Act"). It was urged that this amounted to abuse of dominant position by the Appellant. A complaint … of Appeal No. 23 of 2011 which relates to CCI Case No. 24, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 of 2010 in which Shri Pushkar Dutt Sharma and Smt. Kiran Sharma were the Informants. Similarly Appeal No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2012

M/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-30-2012

Subject : Education

cannot render the Final Findings, without referring the matter to the Competition Commission, under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be held to be valid in the eye of law. The issuance of the Disclosure Statement, by … its functions, as per the provisons of Rule 16 of Anti-Dumping Rules. 35. Further it has been stated, in Section 21 of the Competition Act, … Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, read with Section 9A and 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and to quash the same in respect of goods

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2017

Premier Rubber Mills vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2017

Subject : MRTP

on record, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) passed an order dated 06.11.2013 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 recording a prima facie opinion that the acts and conduct of the Opposite Parties (OP) mentioned therein is … Ms.G.ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE These two writ petitions have been filed with a common prayer to :1. declare Regulation 35 and the proviso to Regulation 37(1) of the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009 as well as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2017

Somi Conveyor Beltings Ltd. & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2017

Subject : MRTP

on record, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) passed an order dated 06.11.2013 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 recording a prima facie opinion that the acts and conduct of the Opposite Parties (OP) mentioned therein is … Ms.G.ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE These two writ petitions have been filed with a common prayer to :1. declare Regulation 35 and the proviso to Regulation 37(1) of the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009 as well as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial