Advanced Search Results
Union of India Through Executive Engineer, Mumbai Central Division No. ...
Mumbai
Apr-20-2015
Arbitration
provided otherwise was a clear abuse of dominant position. The respondent placed reliance on Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 in support of this contention. In the said letter, the respondent alleged that the respondent had always shown … 1. By this petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short âthe said Arbitration Act), the petitioner has impugned the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Gupta Vs. M/S. Paper Merchants Association and Others
Competition Commission of India CCI
Jan-10-2013
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...
Competition Appellate Tribunal
May-19-2014
Land Acquisition
the above-said clauses were described as ex-facie unfair and discriminatory attracting the provisions of section 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter "Act"). It was urged that this amounted to abuse of dominant position by the Appellant. A complaint … consists of Appeal No. 23 of 2011 which relates to CCI Case No. 24, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 of 2010 in which Shri Pushkar Dutt Sharma and Smt. Kiran Sharma were the Informants. Similarly Appeal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-10-2019
MRTP
Ramana, J in Excel Crop. Care (supra), to the following effect: ―84. It is well settled that the Competition Act, 2002 is a regulatory legislation enacted to maintain free market so that the Adam Smith's concept of invincible hands … and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (Section 18); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (Section 34); Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (Section15) etc. This Court notices that firstly, the Act creates new
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...
Chennai
Nov-30-2012
Education
cannot render the Final Findings, without referring the matter to the Competition Commission, under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be held to be valid in the eye of law. The issuance of the Disclosure Statement, by … this Court holds that the writ petitions are maintainable, before this Court. 34. However, the contentions raised on behalf of the respondents stating that the … Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, read with Section 9A and 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and to quash the same in respect of goods
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAccreditation Commission for Conformity Assessment Bodies Pvt. Ltd. Vs ...
Competition Commission of India CCI
Nov-07-2012
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Sarathi Enterprises Vs. Union of India, Through Executive Enginee ...
Mumbai
Jun-06-2016
Arbitration
The Respondent never agreed to it. On the aspect of violation of Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the Competition Act ), the Executive Engineer by letter dated 7 December 2010, had stated that … the parties passed Award dated 6 March 2013. 7. Being aggrieved, the Respondent filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act ) for setting aside the Award.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCybernetics Network Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Bisquare Technologies Pvt ...
Delhi
Feb-24-2012
Land Acquisition
to pay CNPL Rs.98.77,672/- together with interest @ 9% from 30th March 2002 till the date of the Award and interest @ 18% per annum … 1. These three petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the same Award dated 14th March 2005 passed by the … Technical Information as also a list of at least one recommended vendor with the capability to supply at competitive prices consistent with quality standards, each of the parts comprising the STB. Delivery Schedule-means the time within which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPashchimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited vs IL and Fs Engineering an ...
Delhi
Apr-06-2026
Land Acquisition
not replacing the transformers, the Petitioner herein started deducting money from his bills.(xv) Further, the Petitioner issued the competition certificate to theRespondent/Claimant only after the expiry of Defects Liability Period i.e., on 05.04.2022 indicating to the Respondent/Claimant … issued by the CMRS under the Delhi Metro Railway (Operation and Maintenance)Act, 2002 (hereinafter “the Delhi Metro Act”) and heldthat the cumulative effect of the … Kaushik, Mr. Shashank Tiwari and Mr. H.N. Thangal, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADJUDGMENT (ORAL)1. The present Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) has been filed by the Petitioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSecurities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Shri Kanaiyalal Baldevbhai ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-20-2017
MRTP
9 Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Section 36A; The Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r); The Competition Act, 2002, Section 3; The Food Security and Standards Act, 2006, Section 24(2); Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 20; Usurious Loans … client order, if it involves fraud then the dealing in securities will be deemed to be fraudulent. 32 34. An argument has been introduced by the Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, learned senior counsel, that sub-clause (q) of regulation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »