Advanced Search Results

Shri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … on certain combinations (Section 31); acts taking place outside India but having an effect on competition in India (Section 32); power to issue interim orders (Section 33); compensation in case of contravention of orders of Commission (Section 42-A);

M/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties M/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission of India

Jose C Mundadan vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … on certain combinations (Section 31); acts taking place outside India but having an effect on competition in India (Section 32); power to issue interim orders (Section 33); compensation in case of contravention of orders of Commission (Section 42-A);

P.G. Narayanan Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the Secretary, Mi ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Competition Act, 2002 - Sections 3; West Bengal Animal Slaughter Control Act, 1950; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 38, 39C, 142 and 226

Reported in : 2005(3)CTC582; (2005)3MLJ210; [2005]62SCL586(Mad)

bias and since there is imminent danger of the application being considered favourably violating the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, the petitioner is entitled to maintain a quia timet action. Learned counsel further submitted that though specific allegations … read as follows :'i) The Court in exercise of powers under Article 32 and Article 226 of the Constitution can entertain a petition filed by … has been relaxed by the courts to vindicate a legal injury or a legal wrong caused to a section of the people by grave violation of any statutory and constitutional provisions. At the same time, the Supreme

M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others

Dhanraj Pillay Vs. Hockey India

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Smartchem Technologies Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)97TTJ(Ahd.)818

and ammonium nitrate directly or indirectly. In the absence of such agreement, VBC can give directly or indirectly, competition to the company by (1) either manufacturing itself or providing knowledge and management skills to an associate to … undisturbed and freely for a period of five years, which were of intangible nature entitled to depreciation under Section 32 of the Act. and, therefore, assessee may be allowed depreciation.4.12 The AO rejected the assessee's alternative claim also … before the CIT(A).2.1 Issues involved in ITA No. 654/Ahd/2005 for asst. yr. 2002-03 The issues involved in this appeal were admitted to be read as

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of India and Another

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

in proceedings initiated suo moto by it since it is a dominus litus in such proceedings;49 47 The Competition Act 2002; Section 53S; Also see the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009; Regulation 51 48 (2010) 10 SCC744[104]. 49 … the 66 (1924) 1 KB171(CA) 67 1950 SCR62168 AIR1960SC60669 (2002) 5 SCC685 70 “Ordinance” 71 1950 SCR621[11]. Page 32 of 53 PART D Ordinance did not confer a quasi-judicial power: first, whether the opinion can be revised

Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Parties Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr