Advanced Search Results

Ramakant Kini Vs. Hiranandani Hospital

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : Land Acquisition

the above-said clauses were described as ex-facie unfair and discriminatory attracting the provisions of section 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter "Act"). It was urged that this amounted to abuse of dominant position by the Appellant. A complaint … The 2nd group consists of Appeal No. 23 of 2011 which relates to CCI Case No. 24, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 of 2010 in which Shri Pushkar Dutt Sharma and Smt. Kiran Sharma were the

Shri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … dominant position (Section 27); division of enterprise enjoying dominant position (Section 28); orders of Commission on certain combinations (Section 31); acts taking place outside India but having an effect on competition in India (Section 32); power to issue

Jose C Mundadan vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … dominant position (Section 27); division of enterprise enjoying dominant position (Section 28); orders of Commission on certain combinations (Section 31); acts taking place outside India but having an effect on competition in India (Section 32); power to issue

M/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a statutory body established by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Competition Act”, for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the … dominant position (Section 27); division of enterprise enjoying dominant position (Section 28); orders of Commission on certain combinations (Section 31); acts taking place outside India but having an effect on competition in India (Section 32); power to issue

M/S. Olive Lifesciences Private Limited vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … the Tribunal on that date approved the resolution plan. The learned counsel would seek to place reliance on Section 31 of the Code to contend that moratorium under Section 14 of the Code will cease to have effect

Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … Professional’ will place the same immediately before the Adjudicating Authority who in its turn will pass order under Section 31 in accordance with law. The ‘Successful Resolution Applicant’ will take steps for execution of its ‘Resolution Plan’ and

Jitender Bhargava Vs. Competition Commission of India and Others

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : MRTP

against the Order passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter called CCI) under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act 2002 (the Act) permitting the Combination of two airlines namely Etihad Airways PJSC and Jet Airways (India) Ltd. In

Kalpraj Dharamshi Successful Resolution Applicant Vs. Kotak Investment ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as re­ ferred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … such period shall not exceed fifteen days. (3) An appeal against an order approving a resolution plan under Section 31 may be filed on the following grounds, namely- (i) the approved resolution plan is in contravention of the

Knk Construction Private Limited vs M/S Modern Asset

Court : Karnataka

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … view of the approval of the resolution plan and the consequent operation of the Clean Slate doctrine under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). His submission is that once the CIRP process has been