Advanced Search Results
M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...
Competition Appellate Tribunal
May-19-2014
Land Acquisition
the above-said clauses were described as ex-facie unfair and discriminatory attracting the provisions of section 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter "Act"). It was urged that this amounted to abuse of dominant position by the Appellant. A complaint … 3. The 2nd group consists of Appeal No. 23 of 2011 which relates to CCI Case No. 24, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 of 2010 in which Shri Pushkar Dutt Sharma and Smt. Kiran Sharma were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLt. Col. Anjani Kumar Singh Vs. City Corporation Ltd.
Competition Commission of India CCI
Sep-04-2013
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalpraj Dharamshi Successful Resolution Applicant Vs. Kotak Investment ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-10-2021
Land Acquisition
where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as re ferred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … ACCEPTING THE RESOLUTION PLAN OF KALPRAJ?.135. For deciding the said issue, it will be apposite to refer to Section 30 and 31 of the I&B Code, which read thus: “30. Submission of resolution plan.-(1) A resolution applicant may
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dena Bank (now Bank Of Baroda) Vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy
Supreme Court of India
Aug-04-2021
Land Acquisition
that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … the resolution professional appointed under Section 22 shall continue till the appointment of another resolution professional under this section.30. Submission of resolution plan.-(1) A resolution applicant may submit a resolution plan along with an affidavit stating that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinkar Kumar and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Delhi
Nov-05-2014
MRTP
1992; (5) Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969; (6) Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002; (7) Section 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007; (8) Section 22 of the National
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkrishna Forgings Limited Vs. Ravindra Loonkar, Resolution Professio ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-21-2023
Land Acquisition
that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … Authority is satisfied that the resolution plan as approved by the committee of creditors under sub-section (4) of Section 30 meets the requirements as referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 30, it shall by order approve the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMonsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.
Delhi
Mar-28-2017
MRTP
without prejudice to termination notice. CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 50 of 96 65. The Parliament had enacted the Competition Act, 2002, some of the provisions of which came into force on 31.3.2003, its objective being to provide, keeping in … said law by virtue of Section 92, overriding the Patents Act, 1970, it affording a right , under Section 30, to the use of any variety (of plant grouping) by any person as an initial source for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Vikash Trading Company, Represented by Its Proprietor, C.S. Bohar ...
Chennai
Nov-30-2012
Education
cannot render the Final Findings, without referring the matter to the Competition Commission, under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, cannot be held to be valid in the eye of law. The issuance of the Disclosure Statement, by … the provisions of any other law for the time being in force. 30. In Hemant Sharma and others Vs.Union of India and others, 186 (2012) … Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, read with Section 9A and 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and to quash the same in respect of goods
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...
Chennai
Mar-29-2016
MRTP
respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was … to the petitioner, the third respondent also stands to gain, as it gets minimum annual guaranteed revenue for 30 years of commercial operation or a revenue share of 52.33% of the gross revenue, whichever is higher and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Rubber Mills vs.union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Apr-11-2017
MRTP
on record, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) passed an order dated 06.11.2013 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 recording a prima facie opinion that the acts and conduct of the Opposite Parties (OP) mentioned therein is … their act and conduct should not be treated in contravention of Section 3 of the Act latest by 30.06.2015. It was also stated that no further extension could be granted. The petitioners, in their replies though furnished
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »