Advanced Search Results
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2016
MRTP
the impugned orders are perverse? Jurisdiction of CCI to entertain the complaints of Micromax and Intex under the Competition Act, 2002 84. The central challenge in these petitions is to the jurisdiction of the CCI to entertain complaints filed … the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (hereafter 'TRIPS'). 122. By virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002, Section 48 of the Act, which specifies the rights granted to a patentee, was substituted to read as under: … The CCI passed the impugned order dated 12th November, 2013 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act pursuant to an information filed by Micromax. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChettinad International Coal Terminal Private Limited, Rep., by its Di ...
Chennai
Mar-29-2016
MRTP
respondent and quash the impugned order dated 04.01.2016, passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.) The petitioner operates a coal handling terminal at the third respondent Port, Kamarajar Port Limited. The petitioner was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskForech India Limited Vs. Competition Commission of India and Another
Delhi
Sep-29-2016
Land Acquisition
November, 2015 and 2nd December, 2015 remain the same and bind the respondents. The application is disposed of. Competition Act, 2002 Section 26(1) Validity of order Petitioner challenged order of first Respondent under Section 26(1) of the Act as well
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Steel Authority of India Limited Vs. Competition Commission of India a ...
Delhi
May-06-2011
Competition
Competition Act, 2002 - Section 19 read with Section 26(1)
Limited („JSPL), Respondent No. 3, invoked the provisions of Section 19 read with Section 26 (1) of the Competition Act, 2002 („CA') by providing information to the CCI alleging that the Petitioner SAIL had inter alia entered into an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Transparent Energy Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tecpro Systems Ltd.
Competition Commission of India CCI
Jun-11-2013
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Exhibition Industry Association Vs. Ministry of Commerce and In ...
Competition Commission of India CCI
May-06-2013
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAccreditation Commission for Conformity Assessment Bodies Pvt. Ltd. Vs ...
Competition Commission of India CCI
Nov-07-2012
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManoj Hirasingh Pardeshif Vs. Gilead Sciences Inc., Usa
Competition Commission of India CCI
Mar-05-2013
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBig Cbs Networks and Another Vs. Tata Sky Ltd.
Competition Commission of India CCI
Sep-05-2012
MRTP
Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinterglobe Aviation Limited Vs the Secretary Competition Commission of ...
Delhi
Oct-06-2010
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - sections 11(1), 33(1)(d),66 ; Competition Act, 2002 (`CA'). - sections 26(1),66(1), 66(3), 66(4), 66(5)
order dated 16th June 2010 passed by the Competition Commission of India (`CCI') under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (`CA').2. The background to the present petitions is that by an order dated 13 th February 2009, the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »