Advanced Search Results

Union of India Through Executive Engineer, Mumbai Central Division No. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

rendering such findings in favour of the petitioner has held that Special Condition No.8 was in violation of section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and section 3 of Competition Act, 2002 and the contract should be … provided otherwise was a clear abuse of dominant position. The respondent placed reliance on Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 in support of this contention. In the said letter, the respondent alleged that the respondent had always shown

M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : Land Acquisition

the above-said clauses were described as ex-facie unfair and discriminatory attracting the provisions of section 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter "Act"). It was urged that this amounted to abuse of dominant position by the Appellant. A complaint … Chairman 1. In this judgment, we shall be dealing with Appeal Nos. 20 of 2011, 22 of 2011, 23 of 2011, 12 of 2012, 19 of 2012, 20 of 2012, 8 of 2013, 9 of 2013, 11

R.K. Swamy Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)88ITD185(Chennai)

the amount received under separate agreement for non-competition.4.10 Moreover Sub-clause (va) to Section 28 introduced by the Finance Act, 2002 with effect from 1-4-2003 would strengthen the view of the appellant regarding non-taxability of the receipt of non-compete … counsel for the assessee drew the attention of the Assessing Officer to the assessee's letters dated 15-4-1999 and 23-4-1999, wherein he had filed copies of correspondences and cited various court decisions to drive home his point that

Brs Ventures Investments Ltd. Vs. Srei Infrastructure Finance Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002, the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that Act prior to … the resolution plan of the 2nd respondent-corporate debtor. A final resolution plan was submitted by the applicant on 23rd August 2021, proposing to pay a sum of Rs.135 crores within a period of 15 months to the

Prabhat Agri Biotech Ltd. And Anr. Vs.registrar of Plant Varieties and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

it affects its business. The only enactment which uses the term “abusive” is Section 4 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002, which employs it while defining what constitutes “abuse of dominant position” by a business or corporate entity, taking … variety. Other particulars bringing out the characteristics of novelty, distinctiveness and stability are also to be disclosed. Likewise, Section 23 provides for registration of “essentially derived variety” specified by Section 29(2) by the Central Government. Section 39 which

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Hemant Sharma and ors Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); Competition Act, 2002 - Section 19(1)(b); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 19(1)(c), 19(1)(g); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946; Central, State or Provincial Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154(3), 156(3); Competition Commission Act, 2002

policy and conduct of respondent No.2 may, therefore, call for examination by the Competition Commission constituted under the Competition Act, 2002.14. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in State of West … to the said query given by respondent no.2 reads as follows:- "Ans: Action was taken under the following Sections/Clause of the bye laws of All India Chess Federation, Section 9(n) : To take disciplinary action against its … rival to FIDE) they will organize an open tournament at Delhi from 23rd Dec weith a Prize fund of Rs.15 lakhs.All India Chess Federation cautions

Vijay Gupta Vs. M/S. Paper Merchants Association and Others

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Dlf Ltd Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and Anr., (2010) 10 SCC.744. He submits that in this case, while dealing with the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, the Supreme Court has clearly drawn a distinction between the administrative/inquisitorial functions of the commission, and its adjudicatory … and cheated him of Rs. 31,09,50,000/- towards sale proceeds of certain lands. A First Information Report (FIR) under Section 420 IPC was got registered at the instance of respondent no.2 against Sudipti and a few others on … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 23.11.2011 % Judgment delivered on: 03 .01.2012 + W.P.(C) 8128/2011 and C.M. Nos.

Accreditation Commission for Conformity Assessment Bodies Pvt. Ltd. Vs ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI